2019
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07968-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MEGNA Score and Preoperative Anemia are Major Prognostic Factors After Resection in the German Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the importance of surgical resection to achieve long-term survival is undisputed, not all patients benefit from hepatic resections. Especially in cases of advanced disease, poor survival rates were reported in previous publications of larger mono- and multicentric studies as confirmed in our present work [ 10 , 14 , 20 ]. With respect to the simultaneously reported considerable postoperative mortality of up to 10%, preoperative risk stratification is imperatively indicated [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the importance of surgical resection to achieve long-term survival is undisputed, not all patients benefit from hepatic resections. Especially in cases of advanced disease, poor survival rates were reported in previous publications of larger mono- and multicentric studies as confirmed in our present work [ 10 , 14 , 20 ]. With respect to the simultaneously reported considerable postoperative mortality of up to 10%, preoperative risk stratification is imperatively indicated [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This may be a result of an association between higher RSI values and tumor multifocality, which was identified as dependent risk factor for postoperative survival. Unlike other prominent scores, such as the recently validated MEGNA score, the RSI does not require postoperative data (e.g., histopathological staging) and thus can be of value not only for post- but also for preoperative therapeutic decision-making [ 14 ]. Of note, further well-known risk assessment scores, such as the FIB-4, ALBI, or Heidelberg score, were not further evaluated in the current study due to a lack of consistent preoperative monitoring of all required variables [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently, Schnitzbauer et al performed a multicentre analysis of the MEGNA score and validated the score in their study. They described an overall survival at the end of the 5 year follow-up period of 68%, 48%, 32%, and 19%, respectively, for MEGNA groups 0, 1, 2, and 3 [12]. Thus, they presented higher survival rates than in our cohort (43%, 28%, 18%, and 4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Recently, Schnitzbauer et al performed a multicentre validation of the MEGNA score, and came to the conclusion that the risk groups as proposed by the MEGNA score result in a significant stratification regarding OS [12]. However, a direct comparison with the current UICC cancer staging system was not presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%