1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01246071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Medium Energy Instrument on Exosat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our analysis we used Cyg X-1 and Cyg X-2 data from the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) and All-Sky Monitor (ASM ) on board RXTE (Swank 1999) and the medium energy ( ME) detector of EXOSAT (Turner et al 1981). The data are available through the Goddard Space Flight Center public archive.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our analysis we used Cyg X-1 and Cyg X-2 data from the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) and All-Sky Monitor (ASM ) on board RXTE (Swank 1999) and the medium energy ( ME) detector of EXOSAT (Turner et al 1981). The data are available through the Goddard Space Flight Center public archive.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subtracted; deadtime correction has not been applied. Data for the Rapid Burster is the 1-20 keV count rate in the EXOSAT/ME instrument (Turner, Smith, & Zimmermann 1981), with a nominal background count rate of 70 counts s Ϫ1 subtracted; no deadtime correction has been applied. Time resolution of the data shown is 2 s. The vertical scale has been enlarged, cutting off the peak count rates of the bursts, to show the postburst ''dips'' in some detail.…”
Section: Gro J1744ϫ28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We downloaded 1-8 keV background-subtracted EXOSAT light curves from the medium energy (ME) proportional counter (Turner, Smith, & Zimmermann 1981) with 1 s time resolution from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC) 5 at Goddard Space Flight Center for 14 EXOSAT observations (see Parmar et al 1989b for observation details). We were unable to unambiguously maintain a pulsar cycle count across these observations, so we measured pulse frequencies instead.…”
Section: Orbit Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%