The Medication Administration System—Nurses Assessment of Satisfaction (MAS‐NAS) Scale

Hurley, Ann C.; Lancaster, Diane R.; Hayes, J; Wilson-Chase, Chantel; Bane, Anne; Griffin, Martha; Warden, Victoria; Duffy, Mary E.; Poon, Eric G.; Gandhi, Tejal K.

doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2006.00117.x

Cited by 24 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies that reported that nurses were satisfied with HIT found that HIT was easy to use 17,27,41,42,50,[53][54][55][56] and well integrated into the nursing workflow. 13,34 Findings also suggest that nurse satisfaction improved over time 27 and that nurses were more satisfied with the access to information and sense of safety for both themselves and patients.…”

Section: Nurse Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies that assessed nurse attitudes regarding HIT development and implementation found that nurses wanted HIT to benefit patients, 66,71 emphasize patient safety, 29,54,71 maximize effectiveness, 22,29,54,70,72 engage stakeholders, 58,70,71 include adequate training, 58,66,71 and address nurse information needs. [69][70][71] Other studies found that leadership 41,71,73-75 and flexibility 33,75,76 throughout the development, implementation, and evaluation of HIT are important components of a successful integration of HIT into nursing practice.…”

Section: Nurse Attitudes About Hitmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hospital Information Technology Systems' Impact on Nurses and Nursing Care

Waneka

Spetz

2010

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Nurse Satisfactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nurse Attitudes About Hitmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hospital Information Technology Systems' Impact on Nurses and Nursing Care

Waneka

Spetz

2010

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have highlighted the medication incident rate at several healthcare institutions (Gladstone 1995; Pape 2001; Webster 2001; Hurley 2006). According to Davis and Drogasch (1997), there is a wide acknowledgment that the number of medication errors is underreported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic approach of tracking and reporting medication errors at a tertiary care university hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Khowaja¹

2008

TCRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Administering medication is one of the high risk areas for any health professional. It is a multidisciplinary process, which begins with the doctor's prescription, followed by review and provision by a pharmacist, and ends with preparation and administration by a nurse. Several studies have highlighted a high medication incident rate at several healthcare institutions. Methods: Our study design was exploratory and evaluative and used methodological triangulation. Sample size was of two types. First, a convenient sample of 1000 medication dosages to estimate the medication error (95% CI). We took another sample from subjects involved in medication usage processes such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. Two sets of instruments were designed via extensive literature review: a medication tracking error form and a focus group interview questionnaire. Results: Our study fi ndings revealed 100% compliance with a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. The main error rate was 5.5% and pharmacists contributed an higher error rate of 2.6% followed by nurses (1.1%) and physicians (1%). Major areas for improvement in error rates were identifi ed: delay in medication delivery, lab results reviewed electronically before prescription, dispension, and administration.

show abstract

“…Satisfaction with medication administration was assessed using the Medication Administration SystemYNurses Assessment of Satisfaction scale of Hurley et al (2006). Satisfaction with medication administration was assessed using the Medication Administration SystemYNurses Assessment of Satisfaction scale of Hurley et al (2006).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%