2022
DOI: 10.31067/acusaglik.1033648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating role of role overload in the effect of role conflict and role ambiguity on work harassment

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of role ambiguity and role conflict on workplace harassment and the intermediary role of role overload in this effect. The literature includes no research on the relationship between nurses’ workplace role ambiguity, role overload, role conflict and workplace harassment. The study used role overload as a mediating variable, which adds to the originality of the study. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional research design and surveyed 260 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon that the direct effect of role ambiguity is not significant has been supported by some studies. For example, role ambiguity has no significant direct relationship with workplace harassment [ 34 ] or job performance [ 35 ]. These results suggest that, when analyzing the effect of role ambiguity, one may be faced with more complicated situations and should not simply and directly presume role ambiguity as a significant negative effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon that the direct effect of role ambiguity is not significant has been supported by some studies. For example, role ambiguity has no significant direct relationship with workplace harassment [ 34 ] or job performance [ 35 ]. These results suggest that, when analyzing the effect of role ambiguity, one may be faced with more complicated situations and should not simply and directly presume role ambiguity as a significant negative effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%