2010
DOI: 10.1177/0093650210384984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement

Abstract: Empirical studies of citizen communication networks and participation go as far back as the 1940s, with a bolder focus in political—not civic—activities. A consistent finding reveals that individuals with larger networks are more engaged than those with smaller networks. This article expands this line of work with a number of novel tests. First, it compares the predictive power of online versus offline network size on civic engagement. It then explores the role of strong-tie versus weak-tie discussion frequenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
175
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
175
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…While Gil de Zúñiga and Valenzuela (2011) suggest that large and heterogenic networks tend to generate more civic activity, our results were mixed. For the IT team, their diverse personal interests and political affiliations were a reason to discuss news in their WhatsApp group: it was generic enough that all members in the group could talk along.…”
Section: Inclusivenesscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…While Gil de Zúñiga and Valenzuela (2011) suggest that large and heterogenic networks tend to generate more civic activity, our results were mixed. For the IT team, their diverse personal interests and political affiliations were a reason to discuss news in their WhatsApp group: it was generic enough that all members in the group could talk along.…”
Section: Inclusivenesscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Consequently, we may conceive computer-mediated discussions as being more efficient at mobilizing individuals to participate in political affairs. While evidence for such a process has been found in the context of explicitly political forums (see Gil de Zuniga and Valenzuela, 2011), this was a result of self-reported surveys rather than an analysis of the forums themselves. No study has yet examined the extent to which political action emerges in third spaces, where -based on the typically casual, chatty and frivolous nature -we might assume that they are not as goaloriented or efficient at mobilization.…”
Section: Research Focus and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bireylerin heterojen yapıya sahip sosyal ağlardaki faaliyetleri ile sivil ve siyasal katılım arasındaki ilişki, hem demokratik vatandaşlığı teşvik etmesi hem de müzakereci ve katılımcı demokrasilerin kilit göstergelerinden biri olması açısından önemli bir araştırma alanıdır (bkz. Gil De Zuniga ve Valenzuela, 2011;Mutz, 2006;Sunstein, 2001). …”
Section: Dijital Sosyal Ağlar Farklı Görüşlerin Temsili Ve Katılımcıunclassified