2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating effect of interpersonal distrust on the relationship between perceived organizational politics and workplace ostracism in higher education institutions

Abstract: The mediating effect of interpersonal distrust on the relationship between perceived organizational politics and workplace ostracism in Higher Education Institutions, HELIYON, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2021.e07280. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(156 reference statements)
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique of convenience sampling was used to collect the data. This technique helps easily collect data from an available set of respondents, providing helpful information for answering questions and hypotheses (Karim et al, 2021). It is also the most widely used sampling technique because it is fast, uncomplicated, and inexpensive (Etikan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of convenience sampling was used to collect the data. This technique helps easily collect data from an available set of respondents, providing helpful information for answering questions and hypotheses (Karim et al, 2021). It is also the most widely used sampling technique because it is fast, uncomplicated, and inexpensive (Etikan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating workplace ostracism in connection to negative perceptions of pay secrecy policies, only a few studies directly link the two constructs (e.g., Karim, 2021 ; Karim et al, 2021 ). However, there are logical overlaps when viewing the two through the lens of social comparison theory (Adams, 1963 , 1965 ) because social comparison theory is often used to explain the antecedents of workplace ostracism (e.g., Breidenthal et al, 2020 ; Jones et al, 2009 ; Quade et al, 2019 ; Williams, 1997 ) and is used to explain perceptions of pay transparency/secrecy (e.g., Brown et al, 2007 ; Smith, 2000 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With workers likely experiencing both ostracism and cynicism in an environment where there are policies of pay secrecy, there is a need to explore how these perceptions impact the workers. Even though there have only been a few studies exploring the direct relationships of ostracism and perceptions surrounding pay secrecy policies (e.g., Karim, 2021 ; Karim et al, 2021 ), there is a gap in the literature explaining how any construct indirectly impacts the relationship. The current environment likely has workers feeling cynical about the use of pay secrecy policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have called these discounted negative behaviors as uncivil behavior and termed it in organizations as workplace incivility ( Aljawarneh and Atan, 2018 ; Akella and Lewis, 2019 ; Alias et al, 2020 ; Chughtai et al, 2020 ; Megeirhi et al, 2020 ; Vasconcelos, 2020 ). However, these behaviors go unnoticed because of low intensity, minimum negative outcome, and ambiguous intentions to harm others ( Arshad and Ismail, 2018 ), and these deleterious behaviors have been ignored in the past that have led to certain outcomes such as team conflict, knowledge hiding, competition, interpersonal distrust, workplace aggression, lack of tolerance ( Taylor and Kluemper, 2012 ; Aljawarneh and Atan, 2018 ; Arshad and Ismail, 2018 ; Strik et al, 2019 ; Issac et al, 2021 ; Karim et al, 2021 ; Sheidae et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%