2021
DOI: 10.1002/iub.2523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism research on the anti‐liver fibrosis of emodin based on network pharmacology

Abstract: Aims This study was designated to illustrate the underlying mechanisms of emodin anti‐liver fibrosis via network pharmacology and experiment. Methods The TSMCP and Genecards database were applied to screen the relevant targets of emodin or liver fibrosis. The essential target was selected by using Cytoscape to analyze the topological network of potential targets. Furthermore, we constructed a preliminary molecule docking study to explore the binding site by Surflex‐Dock suite SYBYL X 2.0. The DAVID database wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we sketched molecular structures with ChemDraw 14.0. Then the molecules were minimized using Tripos Field ( White, 1977 ; Motoc et al, 1986 ; Waltho et al, 1988 ; Clark et al, 1989 ; Purohit et al, 2020 ) in Sybyl-X 2.0 ( SYBYL, 2012 ; Liang et al, 2021 ). The lowest energy structures were further optimized by undergoing ( Turner et al, 2017 ) (PM7) ( Stewart, 2013 ; Turner et al, 2017 ) in Molecular Orbital PACkage (MOPAC 2016) method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we sketched molecular structures with ChemDraw 14.0. Then the molecules were minimized using Tripos Field ( White, 1977 ; Motoc et al, 1986 ; Waltho et al, 1988 ; Clark et al, 1989 ; Purohit et al, 2020 ) in Sybyl-X 2.0 ( SYBYL, 2012 ; Liang et al, 2021 ). The lowest energy structures were further optimized by undergoing ( Turner et al, 2017 ) (PM7) ( Stewart, 2013 ; Turner et al, 2017 ) in Molecular Orbital PACkage (MOPAC 2016) method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Scutellaria baicalensis decoction has a preventive effect on liver injury, which may be related to the involvement in the metabolism of some tryptophan to reduce oxidative stress and inhibit collagen regeneration [ 127 ]. Emodin extracted from various anthraquinones further affects the fibrotic process by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), reducing Ly6C hi macrophage infiltration Ly6C hi [ 128 ], mediating the p53 signaling pathway to induce HSC apoptosis and the TLR4 pathway to slow down inflammation production and lipid deposition in NAFLD models [ 129 , 130 ]. Moreover, all three can mediate the NF-kB pathway, inhibit the TGF- β and the levels of inflammatory factors such as TNF- α , and antagonize the profibrotic effects of the inflammatory response [ 129 135 ].…”
Section: Tcm Therapeutic Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emodin extracted from various anthraquinones further affects the fibrotic process by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), reducing Ly6C hi macrophage infiltration Ly6C hi [ 128 ], mediating the p53 signaling pathway to induce HSC apoptosis and the TLR4 pathway to slow down inflammation production and lipid deposition in NAFLD models [ 129 , 130 ]. Moreover, all three can mediate the NF-kB pathway, inhibit the TGF- β and the levels of inflammatory factors such as TNF- α , and antagonize the profibrotic effects of the inflammatory response [ 129 135 ]. Studies have shown that ursolic acid (UA) can regulate EMT or MFB via Rho [ 136 , 137 ], improve the integrity of the intestinal barrier, reduce intestinal flora disorders [ 138 , 139 ], and modulate the NOX4/NLRP3 inflammatory vesicle signaling pathway to attenuate liver fibrosis [ 140 ].…”
Section: Tcm Therapeutic Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy was calculated using the SYBYLÀ X 2.0 package [33] with Tripos force field and Gasteiger-Marsili charge. The binding energy of two molecules (A and B) was the difference in the free energies before and after binding: ΔG = G(Ligand-Macromolecule) -G(Ligand) -G(Macromolecule) [34] .…”
Section: Docking Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%