1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112099004243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism of vortex connection at a free surface

Abstract: Vortex connections at the surface are fundamental and prominent features in free-surface vortical flows. To understand the detailed mechanism of such connection, we consider, as a canonical problem, the laminar vortex connections at a free surface when an oblique vortex ring impinges upon that surface. We perform numerical simulations of the Navier–Stokes equations with viscous free-surface boundary conditions. It is found that the key to understanding the mechanism of vortex connection at a free su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
86
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
86
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity profiles in spanwise and streamwise direction, in figure (a), show that the location where the angular velocity equals zero coincides with the point of lowest elevation, but that the vortex is slightly asymmetric. Profiles of the vorticity in (b) show that the vorticity distribution in the vortex is not completely cylindrically symmetric, and that, consequently, the point of maximum vorticity does not coincide with the minimum in elevation, as predicted by Zhang et al (1999). Figure (c) shows profiles (in spanwise direction) of the slope h y = ∂h/∂y derived from PIV by means of the Euler equations, equation (2.32), as well as the directly measured slope, showing that both are broadly the same.…”
Section: A Test Case: Vortex Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The velocity profiles in spanwise and streamwise direction, in figure (a), show that the location where the angular velocity equals zero coincides with the point of lowest elevation, but that the vortex is slightly asymmetric. Profiles of the vorticity in (b) show that the vorticity distribution in the vortex is not completely cylindrically symmetric, and that, consequently, the point of maximum vorticity does not coincide with the minimum in elevation, as predicted by Zhang et al (1999). Figure (c) shows profiles (in spanwise direction) of the slope h y = ∂h/∂y derived from PIV by means of the Euler equations, equation (2.32), as well as the directly measured slope, showing that both are broadly the same.…”
Section: A Test Case: Vortex Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…By setting a threshold for the vorticity, Dabiri excludes smaller and less intense sub-surface vortices. As was already mentioned in chapter 2, Zhang et al (1999) have studied the interaction between a vortex-ring and a free surface by means of numerical simulations. They conclude that the correlation between the surface-normal component of vorticity and the surface elevation is relatively poor, unless the vortex associated with the depression in the surface has a cylindrically symmetric distribution of surface-normal vorticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5(c) shows an upwelling near a strong surface-connected vortex (for the dynamics of the vortex, see e.g. Handler et al 1993;Pan & Banerjee 1995;Zhang, Shen & Yue 1999). In this case, the advection induced by the surface-connected vortex pushes some fluid particles over the upwelling as well.…”
Section: Surface Renewal and Statistics Of Surface Agementioning
confidence: 96%