1950
DOI: 10.3109/10520295009110986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanism of the Gram Reaction. II. The Function of Iodine in the Gram Stain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Steam and Steam (1924) and more recently Fischer and Larose (1952) omitted the use of a counterstain in investigations concemed with the gram reaction. Bartholomew and Mittwer (1950) and Bartholomew et at. (1950) It has been suggested frequently that the difference between gram positive and gram negative organisms is quantitative rather than qualitative in nature (Dubos, 1947).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steam and Steam (1924) and more recently Fischer and Larose (1952) omitted the use of a counterstain in investigations concemed with the gram reaction. Bartholomew and Mittwer (1950) and Bartholomew et at. (1950) It has been suggested frequently that the difference between gram positive and gram negative organisms is quantitative rather than qualitative in nature (Dubos, 1947).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it has been shown that all the dyes which give Gram differentiation form precipitates with iodine [12]. It seems then that iodine merely serves to accentuate the differentiation, probably by forming some form of complex or precipitate with the adsorbed dye and thereby reducing its ease of removal in alcohol, especially since it has been shown that Gram-positive cells are less permeable to iodine in alcoholic solution than Gram-negative ones [64]. A study of reagents which can replace iodine in the Gram reaction shows Table 1. that each is a mild oxidizing agent and can form a precipitate with Crystal Violet [64].…”
Section: The Role Of Iodine In the Gram Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems then that iodine merely serves to accentuate the differentiation, probably by forming some form of complex or precipitate with the adsorbed dye and thereby reducing its ease of removal in alcohol, especially since it has been shown that Gram-positive cells are less permeable to iodine in alcoholic solution than Gram-negative ones [64]. A study of reagents which can replace iodine in the Gram reaction shows Table 1. that each is a mild oxidizing agent and can form a precipitate with Crystal Violet [64]. Nevertheless some oxidizing agents and some reagents which form precipitates with Crystal Violet are unsuitable for use in the Gram reaction, and this suggests that iodine must function not merely as an oxidizing agent, nor merely as a precipitating agent, but as a combination of both.…”
Section: The Role Of Iodine In the Gram Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 29 dye samples reported on here for the first time none proved to be good substitutes for crystal violet.A previous paper in this series (Mittwer, Bartholomew and Kallman, 1950) indicated that differences in cell membrane permeability to alcoholic iodine were part of the Gram stain mechanism. It was found that, increasing precipitate solubility in alcohol or safranin solution gave decreasing differentiation between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A previous paper in this series (Mittwer, Bartholomew and Kallman, 1950) indicated that differences in cell membrane permeability to alcoholic iodine were part of the Gram stain mechanism. Since iodine forms a precipitate with crystal violet, and since the dissolution of this precipitate from the bacterial cell depends on (1) permeability, and (2) general solubility of the precipitate in alcohol and the counterstain, it is clear that a study of dye precipitate solubilities would aid greatly in interpreting the Gram stain mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%