1968
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(68)90088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism of the bacterial reduction of sulphate and of sulphite from isotope fractionation studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
137
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The isotopic enrichment observed in the SO 2À 4 pool can vary from 4‰ to 46‰ depending on the bacterial species involved, the supply of SO 4 , the rate of SO 4 reduction, temperature and pH (Kemp and Thode, 1968;Fritz et al, 1989;Clark and Fritz, 1997). The enrichment of 18 O during bacterial SO 4 reduction is 2.5-4 times less than that of 34 S, but the enrichment increases throughout the reaction until it plateaus (Fritz et al, 1989;Pierre, 1989).…”
Section: Seasonal Dic Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotopic enrichment observed in the SO 2À 4 pool can vary from 4‰ to 46‰ depending on the bacterial species involved, the supply of SO 4 , the rate of SO 4 reduction, temperature and pH (Kemp and Thode, 1968;Fritz et al, 1989;Clark and Fritz, 1997). The enrichment of 18 O during bacterial SO 4 reduction is 2.5-4 times less than that of 34 S, but the enrichment increases throughout the reaction until it plateaus (Fritz et al, 1989;Pierre, 1989).…”
Section: Seasonal Dic Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dur ing sedimentation, the seawater sulfate is general ly preserved as sulfide minerals such as pyrite through bacterial reduction (e.g., see Kemp and Thode, 1968). However, during the process of diagenesis, the possibility of thermochemical sulfate reduction by organic material has been proposed (Orr, 1974(Orr, , 1977Powell and Ma queen, 1984;Machell, 1987;Krouse et al, 1988;Tasse and Schrijiver, 1989;Leventhal, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfur of sedimentary sulfides is generally considered to be derived from that of seawater sulfate (e.g., Kemp and Thode, 1968;Ohmoto and Rye, 1979;Guillemette and Williams-Jones, 1993). Assuming a reasonable difference in δ 34 S value of 15 ~ 20 ‰ between seawater sulfate and sedimentary pyrite related to biogenic reduction process of sulfate (Thode and Monster, 1965), the lowest δ 34 S value of -2.8 ‰ for pyrite from the D 3S2 corresponds to the starting seawater δ 34 S value of +12.2 +17.2 ‰.…”
Section: Resource Geology : D-s Yang M Shimizu H Shimazaki X-hmentioning
confidence: 99%