1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00550769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism of failure in bending of paperboard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such technique is the short-span compression test (SCT), where a short sample of the paperboard is compressed. The failure strength in this test, the SCT value, is considered to be an important measure for, for example, the foldability of the material, see Cavlin 1 and Carlsson et al, 2 and the box compression strength, cf. Ristinmaa et al 3 However, the deformation mechanisms that are active during this test have not yet been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such technique is the short-span compression test (SCT), where a short sample of the paperboard is compressed. The failure strength in this test, the SCT value, is considered to be an important measure for, for example, the foldability of the material, see Cavlin 1 and Carlsson et al, 2 and the box compression strength, cf. Ristinmaa et al 3 However, the deformation mechanisms that are active during this test have not yet been fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A corresponding tensile strain is induced in the convex parts of the bent structure, but since the cellulose structure cannot withstand as large an in-plane strain in compression as in tension, 4-6 the in-plane compressive strain induced by bending is able to break/delaminate the structure without any great risk of tensile failure. Shear strain and stress are also coupled to local bending of the structure but, as has been shown by Cavlin et al 4,7 such stress or strain, even if it is considerable, has no significant effect on the creasing point. Paperboard structures actually start to yield or break by in-plane compression at a strain between 0.1 and 0.5%, while the corresponding range in tension is between 0.3 and 2% 4, 6 and the critical shear strain is much higher, probably 10-30 times higher.…”
Section: In-plane Compressive Stress -The True Creasing Factormentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Paperboard structures actually start to yield or break by in-plane compression at a strain between 0.1 and 0.5%, while the corresponding range in tension is between 0.3 and 2% 4, 6 and the critical shear strain is much higher, probably 10-30 times higher. 3,[7][8][9] During the folding operation the various parts of the creased zone, as appears in Figures 1-3, cooperate effectively to reduce the folding resistance, the parts are enlarged as folding proceeds, approach each other and are finally integrated by the delamination mechanism.…”
Section: In-plane Compressive Stress -The True Creasing Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So it is desirable to minimize unnecessary bending. Minimum radii of curvature for multi-ply boards having mass densities of 590, 700, and 760 kg/m 3 have been measured as 60, 40, and 30 mm, respectively for MD bending [26,28]. Based on these values, the radius at failure of the material used in the present study was estimated as 55 mm.…”
Section: Materials Failurementioning
confidence: 97%