The Mechanism of Auxin Action

Abstract

Summary 1. The article deals mainly with the last decade, although earlier work is briefly surveyed. 2. In general an effect of auxins in increasing cell wall extensibility has been verified, although there is no consistent correlation of growth rate with either elastic or plastic extensibility. There is a general tendency to regard the older methods of measuring extensibilities as too drastic and therefore misleading. 3. Two phases in cell elongation have been recognized, namely, an initial phase of pure wall stretching and a subsequent phase of wall growth by intussusception. Auxins may stimulate the first phase by increasing the swelling capacity of the intermicellar colloids (pectins) through the intermediary of the living protoplasm. The phase of intussusception may also be affected. Most recent theories suggest that these actions are effected by a disturbance of the intramolecular forces concerned in the formation and maintenance of the molecular lattice of the young cell wall (Diehl et al., Burström). 4. The maintenance of cellular osmotic pressures during active elongation has suggested an active solute uptake mediated by an auxin‐augmented respiratory process as the cause of cell elongation (Commoner). The results do not justify these conclusions. 5. The early claims of J. Bonner of a stimulation of respiration by auxin in Avena coleoptiles have been verified under certain experimental conditions. It seems possible that the degree of this stimulation may be influenced by the presence of various components of the Gyorgyi C4 dicarboxylic acid respiration cycle, which occurs in Avena coleoptiles. The use of monoiodoacetic acid as a differential inhibitor is misleading and results so far afford no proof of the action of auxins as a coenzyme in the C4‐acid cycle. 6. Auxin has no effect on the in vitro activity of a wide range of dehydrogenases extracted from Avena coleoptiles or on catalase and some plant oxidases. The heightened dehydrogenase activity of auxin‐treated coleoptiles may be due to an in vivo activation (Berger & Avery) or to an active enzyme synthesis. 7. The production of simple sugars from carbohydrate reserves after auxin application is not due to an activation of diastase or to its ‘elution’ by auxin from a protective colloid. This shift in the starch → sugar equilibrium is probably secondary to the main action of auxin. 8. The original postulates of Koepfli, Thimann & Went concerning the minimum molecular requirements for auxin activity have been verified by all recent work. Most evidence supports the view that auxin is effective only in the undissociated state and not as an anion. It seems unlikely from polarographic investigations that auxins act as respiratory coenzymes by virtue of a reversible oxido‐reduction of the essential double bond in the ring. Physiological activity is probably associated with an essential high (lipophilic) surface activity of the ring and its double bond(s), the polar ‐COOH group being most effective when orientated perpendicular to the plane of this ring. 9. A...

Water Relations of Plant Cells and Tissues

“…I t is difficult to see how pet:meability changes by them selves, as suggested by Pohl (66) and others, can be considered to be the primary cause, since here only rates are affected, and permeability to water is already relatively great. In a recent review, Audus (67) concludes that we must either explain a number of separate effects produced by auxin in different tissues, or we must base our theory on some more fundamental action, or "master reaction" in the sense of Thimann (68). Northen's (69) report of dissociation of protoplasmic proteins by auxin is given as an example.…”

Physiology of Cell Wall Growth

“…This extensive question is beyond the scope of the present report but has been reviewed excellently by Audus (1). I consider, however, that auxin must interfere with some enzymatic system or systems involved in morpho genesis.…”

Protoplasmic Streaming in Tradescantia I. The Effects of Indoleacetic Acid and Other Growth-Promoting Substances on Streaming

“…While not adding further data on the effect of lAA on streaming, Showacre and duBuy (1947) countered Sweeney's argument indirectly by showing that infiltration of Avena coleoptile sections does not prevent the acceleration of growth by IAA. The matter appears to have• rested here, and Audus (1949), on reviewing this field, remarked that "the experiments of Sweeney and Thimann should be repeated under the experimental conditions described in their papers." In 1947 we began to study this problem in another way, by the choice of a different species in which the complications due to the use of cells organized in tis!…”