1977
DOI: 10.1042/bj1670843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism of action of primary alkylsulphohydrolase and arylsulphohydrolase from a detergent-degrading micro-organism

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that secondary alkylsulphohydrolases from certain detergent-degrading micro-organisms are unusual esterases in that they catalyse fission of the C-O bond of the alkyl sulphate ester linkage. The position of bond fission catalysed by a primary alkylsulphatase and an arylsulphohydrolase present in Pseudomonas C12B has now been investigated. The primary alkylsulphatase behaved like the secondary alkylsulphohydrolases in cleaving the C-O bond of potassium heptan-1-yl sulphate. In contra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…strain C12B, in which the constitutive and repressible P1 (2) and inducible P2 (7) are both present during growth on SDS. P1 and P2 have very similar chain-length substrate specificities but are clearly distinguishable by the mechanism of COOOS ester bond cleavage, i.e., OOS in P1 and COO in P2 (3,6). It will be interesting to determine in closer detail the substrate specificities and mechanisms of ester bond cleavage for the new enzymes AP1, AP2, AP3, and DP1; to this end, attempts are currently under way to purify and characterize DP1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…strain C12B, in which the constitutive and repressible P1 (2) and inducible P2 (7) are both present during growth on SDS. P1 and P2 have very similar chain-length substrate specificities but are clearly distinguishable by the mechanism of COOOS ester bond cleavage, i.e., OOS in P1 and COO in P2 (3,6). It will be interesting to determine in closer detail the substrate specificities and mechanisms of ester bond cleavage for the new enzymes AP1, AP2, AP3, and DP1; to this end, attempts are currently under way to purify and characterize DP1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P1 and P2 enzymes have been purified and characterized in detail. While they have the same exclusive specificity for LPAS, they are distinguishable on the basis of the mechanism of COOOS ester bond cleavage (OOS and COO for P1 and P2, respectively) and the regulation of synthesis (P1 is constitutive and P2 is inducible) (2,6,7). Alkylsulfatase activity has also been found in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11) and Aerobacter aerogenes (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two possibilities then remained; either the mechanism is hydrolytic at the C-O bond or separation of SO~-occurs without the direct involvement of water molecules. Sulphatases acting on the C-O bond are a rarity confined to some long-chain alkylsulphatases (Bartholomew et al 1977;Shaw et al 1980;Cloves et al 1977). The majority of sulphatases so far examined hydrolyse at the O-S bond including all mammalian and microbial arylsulpharases (Dodgson et al 1982), choline sulphatase (Lucas et al 1972), D-lactate 2-sulphatase (Crescenzi et al 1984), 2,4-dichlorophenoxy ethylsulphatase (Lillis et al 1983) and butylsulphatase (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Incorporation Of ~So From H21somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the symmetrical esters the question of inversion of configuration does not arise, but presumably here, too, C-O cleavage occurs. This mechanism is proving to be a common feature of both primary (Cloves et al, 1977) and secondary (Bartholomew et al, 1977) alkylsulphohydrolases in the detergent-degrading bacteria, Pseudomonas C 12B and C. terrigena, and contrasts sharply with the arylsulphohydrolases where, in all cases examined, S-0 cleavage is the rule (Spencer, 1958(Spencer, , 1959Cloves et al, 1977). Such divergence in behaviour must surely arise from fundamental differences in the mechanism of action of the two types of sulphohydrolase, although what these differences may be must, for the time, remain a mystery.…”
Section: Molecular-weight Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%