1989
DOI: 10.1063/1.857379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanism for surface wave instability in film flow down an inclined plane

Abstract: The equation governing the average rate of change of disturbance kinetic energy is evaluated for various wavenumbers at fixed values of Reynolds number, Weber number, and angle of inclination. The dominant energy production term is associated with the work done by the perturbation shear stress at the free surface. The mechanism of instability, however, is associated with a shift of perturbation vorticity relative to the surface displacement resulting from advection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The disturbance originates at the free surface where vorticity is produced by the basic flow shear stress. 6,7 Owing to the effects of inertia, the perturbation vorticity tends to be advected downstream relative to the deflection of the free surface so as to cause instability. This shift is opposed by hydrostatic and surface tension forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The disturbance originates at the free surface where vorticity is produced by the basic flow shear stress. 6,7 Owing to the effects of inertia, the perturbation vorticity tends to be advected downstream relative to the deflection of the free surface so as to cause instability. This shift is opposed by hydrostatic and surface tension forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they did not include the apparently small effect of the gas phase into their analysis, which is, of course, suggested by the fact that the shear stress T at the gas-liquid interface is approximately zero. This approach has also been followed by Kelly et al (1989) and Smith (1990Smith ( , 1991, who give two different but in fact complementary explanations for the instability. Kelly et al show that the energy transfer TANg to these waves is indeed through the disturbance shear stresses at the interface, while Smith uses a long-wavelength expansion to discuss the forces and flow patterns involved in creating instability.…”
Section: Gravity-induced Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our discussion on the physical meaning of the different terms in the energy equation [11] summarizes the clear one given by Kelly et al (1989). The terms KINj represent the spatially averaged rate of change of the disturbance kinetic energy.…”
Section: [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying a periodic forcing at the inlet with a sufficiently large amplitude, for instance by periodically changing the flow rate of the liquid film, interfacial waves form as a result of the long-wave instability mechanism [17,18] and synchronize with the forcing frequency [19,20]. Depending on the frequency of the forcing, two wave families can be distinguished [19,21]: γ 1 -waves and γ 2 -waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-wave instability mechanism drives the initially exponential growth of the primary instability which via a secondary modulation instability leads to solitary waves [17,18], yet it has a stabilizing effect after the onset of flow recirculation in the main solitary wave hump as was shown recently by Denner et al [37]. As far as the saturated ("equilibrium") height of a solitary wave is concerned, it is governed by a balance of inertia and the streamwise component of gravity (destabilizing), with surface tension, viscous dissipation and the cross-stream component of gravity (stabilizing).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%