1956
DOI: 10.1159/000141121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mechanics of the Foot, Iv.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory was refuted by Basmajian et al, whose electromyographic studies of the muscles of the foot and ankle [22,23] showed that the height of the longitudinal arch is determined by features of the bone-ligament complex, and that the muscles maintain balance, accommodate the foot to uneven terrain, protect the ligaments from unusual stresses, and propel the body forward. Proponents of this bone-ligament theory believe that the shape of the longitudinal arch under static loads is determined by the shape and interrelationship of the bones, coupled with the strength and flexibility of the ligaments [1,15,22,[24][25][26][27][28]. It is unproven whether the abnormal shape of individual bones and joints represents a primary or secondary reflection of a long-standing flatfoot, though most current authors conclude that excessive ligamentous laxity is the primary abnormality.…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory was refuted by Basmajian et al, whose electromyographic studies of the muscles of the foot and ankle [22,23] showed that the height of the longitudinal arch is determined by features of the bone-ligament complex, and that the muscles maintain balance, accommodate the foot to uneven terrain, protect the ligaments from unusual stresses, and propel the body forward. Proponents of this bone-ligament theory believe that the shape of the longitudinal arch under static loads is determined by the shape and interrelationship of the bones, coupled with the strength and flexibility of the ligaments [1,15,22,[24][25][26][27][28]. It is unproven whether the abnormal shape of individual bones and joints represents a primary or secondary reflection of a long-standing flatfoot, though most current authors conclude that excessive ligamentous laxity is the primary abnormality.…”
Section: Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DONITZ (1903), has stated that the movement is a single hinge movement rotating about a line passing obliquely from the dorso-medial side of the foot, plantarward, posteriorly and laterally to emerge at the lateral side of the heel. Thus, the subtalar joint, as has been noted by WILES (1934), JONES (1945) andHICKS (1953), provides for the rotation between the foot and the leg. In the squatting posture, the talus is tightly embraced by the medial and lateral malleoli, the extreme dorsiflexion (with slight abduction and eversion) of the talo-crural joint allowing of this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With regard to the subtalar joint movement, modifying HICKS (1953), such a compound name as eversion-abduction-dorsiflexion or inversion-adduction-plantarflexion was used for the rotation about its oblique axis. Here the eversien or inversion was the meaning of rotation about an anterior-posterior axis, the abduction or ad duction was that of rotation about a vertical axis, and the dorsiflexion or plantarflexion was that of rotation about a transverse axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sole of their foot was positioned so contact was maintained with a translucent Plexiglas foot plate throughout testing. The axis of rotation of the device was then adjusted in the antero-posterior and superior/inferior directions to approximate the ankle axis of rotation determined by palpation of the distal tips of the medial and lateral malleoli [24]. Torques of 15, 20 and 25 N m was applied using a hand held force gauge and resultant angular kinematics were measured using a digital inclinometer.…”
Section: Passive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%