2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00823.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanics and muscular control of constriction in gopher snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus) and a king snake (Lampropeltis getula)

Abstract: Constriction of prey by gopher snakes Pituophis melanoleucus and king snakes Lampropeltis getula is highly variable in posture, muscular activity and force exertion. These snakes typically use lateral bends of the anterior trunk to wind the body into a vertical coil around the prey. Three common constriction postures are fully encircling loops that form a coil, partially encircling loops, and non-encircling loops that pinion the prey. Initial tightening of a coil occurs by winding or pressing the loops tighter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In snakes, epaxial muscles lying beside the vertebral column are of primary importance for locomotion (Cundall 1987) and constriction (Moon 2000). Magnetic resonance imaging of epaxial musculature has verified that external measurements of epaxial muscle width with callipers provide accurate estimates of actual muscle size (Lourdais et al 2005).…”
Section: Variables Collectedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In snakes, epaxial muscles lying beside the vertebral column are of primary importance for locomotion (Cundall 1987) and constriction (Moon 2000). Magnetic resonance imaging of epaxial musculature has verified that external measurements of epaxial muscle width with callipers provide accurate estimates of actual muscle size (Lourdais et al 2005).…”
Section: Variables Collectedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies have shown that body size and maturation can influence performance patterns for many snake species (Pough 1978;Lind and Welsh Jr 1994;Savitsky and Burghardt 2000;Moon and Tullis 2006). As prey restraint behavior requires muscular movements, the maturation of the epaxial muscles, which has been shown to be active during prey restraint behaviors such as constriction (Moon 2000), may greatly affect the ability of hatchlings to constrict prey as well as the effectiveness of constriction. Thus, the findings that the frequency of more complex prey restraint behaviors (behaviors requiring more than 50% of the trunk) increased across trials and that more complex behaviors were employed by hatchlings in the L treatment in both experiments suggests that regular experience with large prey and/or muscle maturation are important in the development of predatory behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This descriptive result probably reflects a high demand for muscular force (Moon & Candy, 1997), and is consistent with the predatory mode of constriction. MRI data indicated that musculature was significantly variable across body sections, being most developed in the second section, which is a region directly used during prey seizing and constriction (Greene & Burghardt, 1978;Moon, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the use of MRI validated the use of calliper-derived dorsal musculature measurements. The role of epaxial muscles in constriction has attracted considerable interest (Ruben, 1977;Jayne, 1982;Moon, 2000). Our original approach was based on considering inter-individual variation in the width of epaxial muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation