2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanical response of cellular materials with spinodal topologies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the progressive (low trueρ¯) range, σ c and E c scale with trueρ¯ as σnormalc ~ trueρ¯1.34 and Enormalc ~ trueρ¯1.43, respectively. This is in excellent agreement with finite element simulations (Figure b; Figure S3, Supporting Information) as well as the reported theoretical behavior of shell‐based spinodal topologies . In the same relative density range, all other high‐strength lattice materials have considerably less efficient scaling behavior, with scaling exponents of 1.9–2.5 .…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the progressive (low trueρ¯) range, σ c and E c scale with trueρ¯ as σnormalc ~ trueρ¯1.34 and Enormalc ~ trueρ¯1.43, respectively. This is in excellent agreement with finite element simulations (Figure b; Figure S3, Supporting Information) as well as the reported theoretical behavior of shell‐based spinodal topologies . In the same relative density range, all other high‐strength lattice materials have considerably less efficient scaling behavior, with scaling exponents of 1.9–2.5 .…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, in the catastrophic regime, we found σnormalc ~ trueρ¯2.47 and Ec ~ trueρ¯2.27 for our nanospinodals. This is comparable to the theoretically predicted behavior of solid spinodal topologies, in which the solid phase is the direct result of a spinodal decomposition process …”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations