2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanical and chemical stability of the interfaces in bioactive materials: The substrate-bioactive surface layer and hydroxyapatite-bioactive surface layer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the plateau in the basic range has an onset at pH 8.5: the surface treatment creates some acidic groups, but they act as a weak acid and are deprotonated only at a very high pH. The standard deviation of the zeta potential is very small for the entire measurement process (the error bars are almost not visible in the graph), evidencing the good chemical stability [ 49 ] of the surface through the whole pH range explored, and with more stability compared with the untreated Ti surface. Comparing the obtained zeta potential titration curve with the XPS data, we can determine that, in the case of the treated surface, the acidic and basic functionalities are due to the OH groups and that the basic ones play a larger role in determining the surface charge of the treated material because of their chemical reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the plateau in the basic range has an onset at pH 8.5: the surface treatment creates some acidic groups, but they act as a weak acid and are deprotonated only at a very high pH. The standard deviation of the zeta potential is very small for the entire measurement process (the error bars are almost not visible in the graph), evidencing the good chemical stability [ 49 ] of the surface through the whole pH range explored, and with more stability compared with the untreated Ti surface. Comparing the obtained zeta potential titration curve with the XPS data, we can determine that, in the case of the treated surface, the acidic and basic functionalities are due to the OH groups and that the basic ones play a larger role in determining the surface charge of the treated material because of their chemical reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the studies reported by Barry et al [66] the nature of the substrate could influence the surface roughness and coating thickness but there are no significant differences between the interface properties and the coating composition depending on the type of alloy. Moreover, Ferraris et al [67] reported that the substrate also influences the biological properties of the samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the proposed samarium ions antimicrobial mechanisms was due to the fact that samarium ions have the ability to change the fungal cell membrane permeability by attaching to it and affecting in the process the fungal cell's adhesion, ion conductivity and cell signaling [14]. More than that, both Barry et al and Ferraris et al [60,61] reported in their studies that the nature of the substrate could influence the biological properties of the samples. In addition, the studies showed that not only the composite and/or substrate are responsible for the biological properties of the coatings but also the synergic connections that appear between the substrate and the thin layer [60,61].…”
Section: Sionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than that, both Barry et al and Ferraris et al [60,61] reported in their studies that the nature of the substrate could influence the biological properties of the samples. In addition, the studies showed that not only the composite and/or substrate are responsible for the biological properties of the coatings but also the synergic connections that appear between the substrate and the thin layer [60,61].…”
Section: Sionsmentioning
confidence: 99%