2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122x.2004.21401.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Wound Infection after Breast Surgery

Abstract: Infection in breast wounds often occurs in the form of cellulitis, but the conventional criteria for wound infection are the presence of either pus or a serous discharge containing pathogens. Wound scoring systems may offer a more quantitative and clinically relevant approach when evaluating the morbidity caused by infection in wounds. The aim of this study was to develop a wound scoring system for patients undergoing breast surgery. The components of previously described wound scoring systems were measured in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Hall and Hall 23 reported a rate of cellulitis of 11% and a rate of abscesses of 4.6% following breast surgery, a result that was similar to that found in the present study. Therefore, care should be taken to ensure that antisepsis of the surgical area is strictly observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Hall and Hall 23 reported a rate of cellulitis of 11% and a rate of abscesses of 4.6% following breast surgery, a result that was similar to that found in the present study. Therefore, care should be taken to ensure that antisepsis of the surgical area is strictly observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This complication was strongly influenced by the no drain group, in which the rate was 13.5% versus 2.4% in the drainage group. If we consider only the data from the drainage group, then the rate encountered was similar to rates reported from other previously published studies 1,6,23.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The variation in reported rates depends on the type of breast operation, definitions used for infection, surveillance methods to identify infections, and length of postoperative follow-up. 4 Using standardized surveillance for one year after surgery, we previously reported SSI rates for specific breast operations at a single institution ranging from 1.1% after reduction mammoplasty, 4.4% after mastectomy, 6.2% after mastectomy with immediate flap reconstruction, to 12.4–16.5% after mastectomy with immediate implant. 5;6 The goal of our study was to determine the incidence of SSI in a large population of women with private health insurance following mastectomy with and without immediate implant or flap reconstruction performed at many different facilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of wound complications after breast cancer surgery ranges from 6 to 30% (Sorenson et al, 2002;Tran et al, 2003;Hall and Hall, 2004) and is increased if there is associated axillary surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between wound complications and systemic recurrence after excision of primary operable breast cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%