1983
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.46.11.1006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of muscle strength in patients with peripheral neuromuscular disorders.

Abstract: SUMMARY The variability of voluntary isometric strength measurements has been assessed in normal subjects and patients with peripheral neuromuscular disorders. Knee extensor strength was measured in a muscle testing chair 13 times over 5 months in each of six normal subjects: coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 4-5 to 14-0% (mean 8.5%) for individual legs in different subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Furthermore, the quadriceps strength recorded in this study cannot be considered subnormal because subjects with quadriceps strength below 160N and body weight >40 kg are considered to have subnormal strength. 28 This study confirms the extreme importance of quadriceps muscle strength for activities of daily living, including standing up, sitting down, and stair climbing.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…27 Furthermore, the quadriceps strength recorded in this study cannot be considered subnormal because subjects with quadriceps strength below 160N and body weight >40 kg are considered to have subnormal strength. 28 This study confirms the extreme importance of quadriceps muscle strength for activities of daily living, including standing up, sitting down, and stair climbing.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A variety of quantitative measures have been employed, some using strain gauges and others with hand-held myometers [15,17]. However, the first well-defined method to be used in clinical trials of motor neuron disease was developed by Munsat and Andres [16,[18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Quantitative Muscle Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spinal cord-injured patients, use of a hand-held myometer was much more reliable than MMT testing [26]. In the clinic, quantitative strength measurements with a hand-held device has been useful in a variety of neuromuscular diseases [17,27]. In general, however, reproducibility was not as good for TQNE in most cases, and issues were raised about variability of both patient and evaluator positioning, as well as the fact that, for strong muscles, the strength of the evaluator might be less than the patient [21].…”
Section: Quantitative Muscle Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method requires the examiner to have sufficient strength to hold the HDD steady, which can be difficult when measuring isometric muscle strength of the lower limbs, especially when the subject is strong and the examiner weak. The limit of the manual resistance was reported to be from 220 to 294.2 N (30 kg) in previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Methods previously reported for fixing a HHD to overcome this problem and prevent the angle of the joint from changing include using a stick 7) , a steel support 8) , and a belt [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%