1989
DOI: 10.3109/00498258909042294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement ofD-Fenfluramine and Its Metabolite,D-Norfenfluramine in Plasma and Urine with an Application of the Method to Pharmacokinetic Studies

Abstract: 1. A specific and sensitive gas chromatographic assay is described for the measurement of d-fenfluramine and its de-ethylated metabolite, d-norfenfluramine, in biological fluids, together with some data on its application to the oral pharmacokinetics of the drug. 2. The analytical method developed has advantages over the previously described methods since it uses nitrogen specific detection and, when applied routinely, enables smaller sample volumes to be used (typically 1 ml of plasma) with a shorter chromato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detected amounts of Norf are lower than Fen, which could be related at least for two reasons. First, although the patients in this study are suspected to ingest N-Fen rather than Fen and the information concerning its metabolism in human are not available, the reported levels of Fen in human plasma following its oral administration compared to the metabolite, Norf, is much higher [24][25][26]. The second reason possibly related to the difference in the incorporation rates of Fen and Norf into hair where also no reports are available.…”
Section: Segmental Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The detected amounts of Norf are lower than Fen, which could be related at least for two reasons. First, although the patients in this study are suspected to ingest N-Fen rather than Fen and the information concerning its metabolism in human are not available, the reported levels of Fen in human plasma following its oral administration compared to the metabolite, Norf, is much higher [24][25][26]. The second reason possibly related to the difference in the incorporation rates of Fen and Norf into hair where also no reports are available.…”
Section: Segmental Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The inter-and intra-assay coe¦cients of variation over the ranges encompassed by the standard curve were 4.8 % and 2.4 % for prolactin and 4.1 % and 2.6 % for cortisol, respectively. d-Fenßuramine and its major metabolite, d-norfenßuramine, were assayed by a modiÞed gas liquid chromatographic technique with a nitrogen / phosphorus detector (Richards et al 1989). The inter-and intraassay coe¦cients of variation for d-fenßuramine were 6.9 % and 6.1 % and for d-norfenßuramine 16.6 % and 6.1 %.…”
Section: Biochemical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods of measuring the DF and dNF concentrations using GC and nitrogen specific detection have been described previously (23). GC was performed by the Poisons Unit at Guy's St. Thomas Hospital Trust (London, UK) on plasma and brain tissue samples taken from 10 widely distributed regions.…”
Section: Correction For Drug Plus Metabolites In Nonbrain Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%