1968
DOI: 10.1086/460443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Attitudes toward Arithmetic with a Likert-Type Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adams and Von Brock (1967) devised a 35-item mathematics attitude scale based on the six attitudinal levels of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Affective Domain (Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia, 1964). As a final example of a Likert scale, Dutton and Blum (1968) reworded the most discriminating items from Dutton's earlier Thurstonetype scale and formed them into a Likert-scale format. Nealeigh (1967) experimented with a picture-preference test as a projective measure of pupil attitudes and "achievement proneness" in mathematics.…”
Section: Attitude Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adams and Von Brock (1967) devised a 35-item mathematics attitude scale based on the six attitudinal levels of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Affective Domain (Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia, 1964). As a final example of a Likert scale, Dutton and Blum (1968) reworded the most discriminating items from Dutton's earlier Thurstonetype scale and formed them into a Likert-scale format. Nealeigh (1967) experimented with a picture-preference test as a projective measure of pupil attitudes and "achievement proneness" in mathematics.…”
Section: Attitude Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even under more contemporary mathematics curricula, junior high school seems to be a critical point in the determination of attitudes toward mathematics (see Dutton, 1968). Dutton and Blum (1968) surveyed by questionnaire the reasons for disliking and liking arithmetic in 346 sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade pupils who had been taught "new math" for at least one year. The most frequent reasons which the students gave for disliking the subject were: working problems outside of school, word problems that were frustrating, possibilities of making mistakes in arithmetic, and too many rules to learn.…”
Section: The ]Unior-high-school Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutton and Blum (1968), for example, found that the statement "Word problems are frustrating" was one of the more commonly agreed-with statements among 346 students in Grades 6 through 8. Unfortunately, there is little doubt that many people have strong negative feelings about story problems.…”
Section: Larry Sowdermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of mathematics goes beyond the academic domain and basic skills in mathematics are required for daily living. Mathematics anxiety, which impacts directly on Math"s proficiency, is not a new concept but has been welldocumented since the 1950s [1] [2][3] [4][5] [6]. The term first appeared when some teachers of mathematics were observed while teaching, in the early 1950s and was introduced to depict learners' attitudinal challenges with mathematics [7].…”
Section: Introdcutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus within that time was devoted to the definition of mathematics anxiety [9]. This was later shifted to the assessment of attitudes towards mathematics [1]; followed by the development of standardized mathematics anxiety instruments, the Number Anxiety scale [7], Mathematical Anxiety Rating Scale [2], the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales [10], the Anxiety Towards Mathematics Scale [11], and the Mathematics Anxiety Questionnaire [12]. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS) developed by Richardson and Suinn [2] is one of the most extensively used mathematics anxiety instruments.…”
Section: Introdcutionmentioning
confidence: 99%