1972
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement in vitro of dentine abrasion by toothpaste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
7

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean depth of the brushing groove was calculated with specially designed software. Profilometrical determination of brushing abrasion is favored by several investigators since this procedures allows for standardized and reproducable evaluation of dental hard tissue wear [Ashmore et al, 1972;Slop et al, 1983;Valk et al, 1986;Noordmans et al, 1991].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean depth of the brushing groove was calculated with specially designed software. Profilometrical determination of brushing abrasion is favored by several investigators since this procedures allows for standardized and reproducable evaluation of dental hard tissue wear [Ashmore et al, 1972;Slop et al, 1983;Valk et al, 1986;Noordmans et al, 1991].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 A patient's reasons for wearing a partial denture are ascribed to improved appearance surface has a complex three-dimensional shape, for example that of the occlusal surface of a molar tooth, this reconstruction is difficult if not possible. 25 Many instruments and techniques have been used in the metrology of surfaces including contact profilometry, close range photogrammetry using a photographic camera, a reflex microscope or a scanning electron microscope. These methods all have advantages and disadvantages related to their ease of use, accuracy and range of measurement.…”
Section: Research Prostheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is discussed in detail by Ashmore, Van Abbe, and Wilson. 2 Hardness tests were done on a miniload microhardness testere using a Knoop diamond pyramid indenter loaded at 0.5 N.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%