2014
DOI: 10.1177/1359105314539530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measure of Sickle Cell Stigma: Initial findings from the Improving Patient Outcomes through Respect and Trust study

Abstract: Research about the influence of stigma on health outcomes in sickle cell disease is limited. We administered the recently developed Measure of Sickle Cell Stigma to 262 patients in the United States. The Measure of Sickle Cell Stigma yielded very good internal consistency and four interpretable factors. Significant associations among stigma, pain-related healthcare utilization, and perceived disease severity were observed for three of the four stigma factors (F range = 2.78–5.44). The Measure of Sickle Cell St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
82
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we made the necessary transformation of the pain frequency variable in order to address issues of skewness and kurtosis, thereby reducing the overestimation that might have led to spurious findings. Finally, our focus on internalized stigma represents a unique perspective that distinguishes this work from approaches that rely on global measurement of the stigma construct and extends previous work that failed to concurrently assess depressive symptoms, patient-reported pain frequency, and stigma (Bediako et al, 2016; Jenerette et al, 2012). We see this as a significant strength because our approach is consistent with the recent research literature which suggests that assessing the multidimensional nature of stigma increases the likelihood of a more distinctive comprehension of how stigma operates, which might then lead to the development of more efficient and effective interventions (Earnshaw, Smith, Cunningham, & Copenhaver, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we made the necessary transformation of the pain frequency variable in order to address issues of skewness and kurtosis, thereby reducing the overestimation that might have led to spurious findings. Finally, our focus on internalized stigma represents a unique perspective that distinguishes this work from approaches that rely on global measurement of the stigma construct and extends previous work that failed to concurrently assess depressive symptoms, patient-reported pain frequency, and stigma (Bediako et al, 2016; Jenerette et al, 2012). We see this as a significant strength because our approach is consistent with the recent research literature which suggests that assessing the multidimensional nature of stigma increases the likelihood of a more distinctive comprehension of how stigma operates, which might then lead to the development of more efficient and effective interventions (Earnshaw, Smith, Cunningham, & Copenhaver, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Internalized stigma was assessed with a subscale from the Measure of Sickle Cell Stigma (MoSCS), an 11-item instrument that measures disease-specific stigma (Bediako et al, 2016). Participants indicated their level of agreement with three items that assess negative feelings or guilt about having SCD (e.g., “I feel that I'm not as good as others because I have sickle cell disease”; “I feel guilty because I have sickle cell disease”; “Having sickle cell disease makes me feel that I am a bad person”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the term^sickler^has historically been used in medical discourse to describe individuals living with sickle cell disease. Members of this patient population have voiced discomfort with this label and may view it as a sign of disrespect (Bediako et al 2016;Wailoo 2006). As a general best practice, individuals should be trained to avoid the attachment of medical characteristics to individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%