The measure of processes of care (MPOC): validation of the Dutch translation

Schie, Petra E. M. van; Siebes, R. C.; Ketelaar, Marjolijn; Vermeer, A.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00451.x

Cited by 43 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, little research has examined the relationship between family functioning, parenting stress, and parent style. For instance, O'Neil, Palisano, and Westcott (2001) and van Schie et al (2004) found a moderate relationship between helpgiving practices and parent stress. While parental functioning has been extensively examined in families that have a child with a disability (Cuskelly et al, 2002), and it is clear that parents' experiences differ in relation to the disability of their child (Abbeduto et al, 2004) as well as many other aspects of family life, few studies have investigated the relationship between the adaptive capacity of the family system, parenting style, and educational styles in relation to parents' ages.…”

Section: Parenting Style Differences Between Groupsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Family and parental functioning in parents of disabled children

Cuzzocrea

Larcan

Westh³

2013

Nordic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In accord with the Resiliency Model of Family Stress, Adjustment, and Adaptation and the Global Focus Model, this study investigated family functioning, parental stress, and parenting style. Four aspects (energy, focus of attention, experiential modality, and regulation) of parent -child interactions were analyzed. The aim of the research was to explore differences between differently aged parents (30 -40 vs. 50-60 years) of a child with an intellectual disability and those with a nondisabled child. The participants were 32 couples with disabled children and 32 couples with nondisabled children. Participants were asked to fill out self-report questionnaires (Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale, Parenting Stress IndexShort Form, and Parents Preference Test), which were individually presented. The results showed differences in family functioning, parenting stress, and parenting style in the two types of families with differently aged parents. The results confirm the need to better examine family functioning in contexts in which each component inevitably dynamically contributes to ensure a proper fit and to reduce the vulnerability of the family system.

show abstract

Section: Parenting Style Differences Between Groupsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Family and parental functioning in parents of disabled children

Cuzzocrea

Larcan

Westh³

2013

Nordic Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore two future adjustments of the questionnaire are suggested here, which were addressed in related studies [18,22,40]. Firstly, a GYV-20 scale score does not correct for the value adolescents and young adults attribute to certain acts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this questionnaire is not suitable to be filled out by adolescents, and by altering the contents, the questionnaire would have to be validated once again. The aforementioned variable that correlated highly with CSQ scores in a previous study [22], was therefore chosen to determine the concurrent validity.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In The Netherlands, the MPOC [22] and the MPOC-SP [18] were made available recently, but a valid measure to ask for the adolescent's or young adult's view on the process of care was not available yet. Since one of the official aims for future paediatric rehabilitation in The Netherlands is to pay more attention to youth [23], such a measure has a high clinical relevance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of the Dutch Giving Youth a Voice Questionnaire (GYV-20): A measure of the client-centredness of rehabilitation services from an adolescent perspective

Siebes

Wijnroks

Schie

et al. 2007

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The occurring of these items will be assessed as well as how important they are to parents. In this study the Dutch version of the MPOC will be used, with good psychometric properties [57]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

LEARN 2 MOVE 2-3: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of child-focused intervention and context-focused intervention in preschool children with cerebral palsy

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLittle is known about the efficacy and the working mechanisms of physical and occupational therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy (CP). In recent years a shift from a child-focused intervention approach to a more context-focused intervention approach can be recognized. Until now the evidence on the efficacy and the working mechanisms of these interventions for children with CP is inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and working mechanisms of two intervention approaches compared to regular care intervention in improving mobility and self-care skills of children (2-3 years) with CP and their families: a child-focused intervention approach and a context-focused intervention approach.Methods/DesignA multi-centre, randomized controlled trial research design will be used. Ninety-four children with CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I-IV; age 2 to 3 years), their parents, and service providers (physical and occupational therapists) will be included. During a period of six months children will receive child-focused, context-focused or regular care intervention. Therapists will be randomly assigned to deliver either a child-focused intervention approach, a context-focused intervention approach or regular care intervention. Children follow their therapist into the allocated intervention arm. After the six months study-intervention period, all participants return to regular care intervention. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, after six months and at a three months follow-up period. Primary outcome is the capability of functional skills in self-care and mobility, using the Functional Skills Scale of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Other outcomes will be quality of life and the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - for Children and Youth (ICF-CY), including body function and structure, activities (gross motor capacity and performance of daily activities), social participation, environmental variables (family functioning, parental empowerment).DiscussionThis paper presents the background information, design, description of interventions and protocol for this study on the efficacy and working mechanisms of child-focused intervention approach and context-focused intervention approach compared to regular care intervention in mobility and self-care skills of children (2-3 years) with CP.Trial registrationThis study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register as NTR1900

show abstract

The measure of processes of care (MPOC): validation of the Dutch translation

Abstract: The construct and concurrent validity of MPOC-NL was shown by confirmative analyses of the original Canadian scale structure, and by modest Spearman correlations between MPOC-NL scores and satisfaction and stress variables. MPOC-NL is internally consistent and reliable.

Cited by 43 publications

References 19 publications

Family and parental functioning in parents of disabled children

Family and parental functioning in parents of disabled children

Validation of the Dutch Giving Youth a Voice Questionnaire (GYV-20): A measure of the client-centredness of rehabilitation services from an adolescent perspective

LEARN 2 MOVE 2-3: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of child-focused intervention and context-focused intervention in preschool children with cerebral palsy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About