2012
DOI: 10.1093/sf/sos121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measure of American Religious Traditions: Theoretical and Measurement Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents can also identify as having no religious affiliation or no religious preference. To date this is the best scheme to classify religious affiliation using the GSS (Woodberry, et al, 2012). Following Scheitle and Adamczyk (2010), we also consider those who affiliate with strict, high-cost religious groups: Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Seventh Day Adventists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents can also identify as having no religious affiliation or no religious preference. To date this is the best scheme to classify religious affiliation using the GSS (Woodberry, et al, 2012). Following Scheitle and Adamczyk (2010), we also consider those who affiliate with strict, high-cost religious groups: Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Seventh Day Adventists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their update to the 2000 article, Woodberry et al. (:68–69) suggest that these respondents may be divided based on belief in god or life after death, or frequency of prayer or religious service attendance. Further, they call for these respondents who do not make the cut as Evangelicals to be placed in a “nominal religion category” (Woodberry et al.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Religious Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, they call for these respondents who do not make the cut as Evangelicals to be placed in a “nominal religion category” (Woodberry et al. :69). However, it is clear that “affiliation even of a nominal sort is deemed important for personal and social reasons” (Roof and McKinney :77).…”
Section: Conceptualizing Religious Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much debate on the classification of conservative, evangelical and/or fundamentalist Christians. We have chosen to go with the term evangelical for three reasons suggested by Woodberry et al (2012): (1) Using the term evangelical avoids confusing religious and political orientations; (2) movement leaders seem to prefer and be more comfortable with this term over conservative or fundamentalist; and (3) the umbrella organization for this population, The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), has chosen the term evangelical. 1 Smith (2000: 17) argues that there are no direct variables to measure conservative Protestants or evangelicals ''only proxy measures that work more or less well to mark them.''…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%