“…Regardless, these correlations prove neither model definitively, and interpretation of the results is confounded by the fact that some observations do not fit into this breakdown easily. A mutation in the active site of NDV HN can block fusion without preventing F-HN association (33), some HeV G stalk mutants with decreased fusion lose F association (4), and some MeV F transmembrane mutants with enhanced fusion show improved F1-H association (40). In addition, NA treatment of cells to remove the receptor resulted in enhanced NDV F-HN coIP, consistent with the clamp model (36).…”
“…Regardless, these correlations prove neither model definitively, and interpretation of the results is confounded by the fact that some observations do not fit into this breakdown easily. A mutation in the active site of NDV HN can block fusion without preventing F-HN association (33), some HeV G stalk mutants with decreased fusion lose F association (4), and some MeV F transmembrane mutants with enhanced fusion show improved F1-H association (40). In addition, NA treatment of cells to remove the receptor resulted in enhanced NDV F-HN coIP, consistent with the clamp model (36).…”
“…TM-TM interactions could also influence triggering of membrane fusion. Interactions with the viral attachment protein are hypothesized to trigger fusion for most paramyxovirus F proteins (2, 3) except for HMPV F (67), and altered association of the measles attachment protein with the cleaved fusogenic F 1 ϩ F 2 protein was observed when specific mutations were introduced into the F TM domain (17). Alterations in TM-TM association due to attachment protein interactions or alterations in the lipid environment could regulate the dissociation of the heptad repeat B coiled-coil needed to reach the final fusogenic structure (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have observed that modifications to the TM domain can result in modulation of class I viral fusion protein activity (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), including impairment of fusion pore opening or enlargement (13-15, 19 -21) or alterations in the efficiency of fusion promotion (18,22,23). Recent studies have also demonstrated an important role for the TM domains of class II fusion proteins (24) and reovirus fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) proteins (25) in the fusion process.…”
Background: Mutations in transmembrane domains can affect activity of viral fusion proteins, but little is known about potential interactions between these domains. Results: Isolated paramyxovirus fusion protein transmembrane domains interact as trimers. Conclusion: Viral fusion protein transmembrane domains self-associate. Significance: Transmembrane domain associations may regulate stability of the prefusion conformation.
“…Another possibility is that the H(N481Y/H495R) protein might have some defects in functional interaction with the F protein. Several reports indicated that the formation of the F-H protein complex influences the fusion function of MV (6,28,34). Experiments are now under way to examine the formation of the F-H protein complex to elucidate this point.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.