The European Higher Education Area 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
1
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
90
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, defining student engagement and how to study it is a continuing debate (Ashwin and McVitty 2015;Kahu 2013). In the NSSE, time spent studying is operationalized as the average number of hours each week, with a choice of three categories (<5, 5-21, >21 h per week).…”
Section: Research On Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, defining student engagement and how to study it is a continuing debate (Ashwin and McVitty 2015;Kahu 2013). In the NSSE, time spent studying is operationalized as the average number of hours each week, with a choice of three categories (<5, 5-21, >21 h per week).…”
Section: Research On Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ej., Ashwin y McVitty, 2016;Blaya y Bergamaschi, 2015;CEDEFOP, 2010;Davies, Lamb y Doecke, 2011;Day, 2013;Evans et al, 2009;Kettlewell et al, 2012;Magalhaes et al, 2015;Nelson, 2011;Nelson y O' Donell, 2012 …”
Section: Desafección Escolar Y Abandono: Un Tema Que Preocupaunclassified
“…These elements also form the basis Kahu's conceptual framework for understanding student engagement that identifies three dimensions of the concept: the affect ('interest, enthusiasm and belonging') cognition ('deep learning, self-regulation') and behaviour ('time and effort, interaction, participation') (Kahu, 2013:766). Whilst several writers make a distinction between cognitive, emotional and behavioural dimensions many other use them interchangeably (Ashwin and McVitty, 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Confusionmentioning
confidence: 99%