Studies in the History of the English Language II 2004
DOI: 10.1515/9783110897661.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The meanings and uses of the progressive construction in an early eighteenth-century English network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjective (or modal, non-aspectual, or attitudinal) uses of the progressive construction are noted throughout its history, since its earliest recorded uses in Old English (Fitzmaurice, 2004;Núñ ez-Pertejo, 2004;Smitterberg, 2004). It would therefore be historically inaccurate to regard the progressive in English as developing from a pure aspectual marker into a grammatical device that expresses further senses.…”
Section: Aspectual Contrasts In English and Setswanamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subjective (or modal, non-aspectual, or attitudinal) uses of the progressive construction are noted throughout its history, since its earliest recorded uses in Old English (Fitzmaurice, 2004;Núñ ez-Pertejo, 2004;Smitterberg, 2004). It would therefore be historically inaccurate to regard the progressive in English as developing from a pure aspectual marker into a grammatical device that expresses further senses.…”
Section: Aspectual Contrasts In English and Setswanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another elaboration of the meaning of the progressive is what Fitzmaurice (2004: 134) calls the use of the progressive to express speaker/writer stance or attitude, specifically the adoption of a non-neutral stance towards the proposition, usually a sense of disapproval or irritation (Fitzmaurice, 2004;Quirk et al, 1985: 199), although it may simply be mild disbelief (Williams, 2002: 28-9). In a similar vein, Quirk et al (1972: 92-3) and Biber et al (1999: 475) identify the extended senses of vividness of description, emotional colouring or emphasis for the progressive construction.…”
Section: Aspectual Contrasts In English and Setswanamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, Kranich (2010a,b) has argued for interpreting the historical development of the English progressive in Early and Late Modern English as a case of de-subjectification, counter to previous research that has presented it as a paradigm case of subjectification (especially Fitzmaurice (Wright) in Wright (1995), Fitzmaurice (2004b), and elsewhere). The main reason is that in the decisive period of grammaticalization of the English progressive to a common aspect marker in the second half of the 18th century subjective uses significantly decline in number.…”
Section: (9)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In examples (22a–b) be V ‐ing is used to ‘suggest that the speaker feels rather doubtful or uncertain (…) in order to make the sentence more tentative, hence more polite’ (Declerck : 163) and to put less ‘pressure on the listener’ (Declerck : 166). This nearly epistemic function of the progressive form has alternatively been called the ‘experiential’, ‘non‐factive’ progressive (Fitzmaurice ), the ‘emotional colouring’ function of the progressive (Onions : 113) and the ‘attitude‐focused’ (instead of aspectual, action‐focused), subjective (Killie ) or affective progressive (Rydén ). The expression of uncertainty and tentativeness of the speaker in be V ‐ing most probably has its origins in the power of the grammatical progressive to recount a situation as durative instead of eternally static, that is, as having limited duration.…”
Section: Differences Between Be V‐ing and Be In The Middle/midst/amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random sample based on part of the data would therefore not have been representative. Rather than narrowing down on genre (a factor that is often cited in the literature for its effect on the different aspectual and grammatical uses of the progressive; Smitterberg ; Fitzmaurice ), I decided to limit the sample to be V ‐ing forms attested in 2010. As this still generated too many hits for the COCA to handle, the cut‐off point for my random sample was a frequency greater than ten tokens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%