2019
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The meaning-making mechanism(s) behind the eyes and between the ears

Abstract: In this contribution, the following four questions are discussed: (i) where is meaning?; (ii) what is meaning?; (iii) what is the meaning of mechanism?; (iv) what are the mechanisms of meaning? I will argue that meanings are in the head. Meanings have multiple facets, but minimally one needs to make a distinction between single word meanings (lexical meaning) and the meanings of multi-word utterances. The latter ones cannot be retrieved from memory, but need to be constructed on the fly. A mechanistic account … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the association between MTG activity and lexical-semantic processing (Friederici, 2012;Hagoort, 2017), the effect in MTG could reflect the build-up of richer semantic representations as sentences progress, more so than during the progression of word-lists. The absence of an effect of index in word-lists in the angular gyrus may be consistent with the view that this region is a hub to integrate different types of information extracted by various parts of the language network (Binder & Desai, 2011;Hagoort, 2003Hagoort, , 2019. In contrast to unfolding well-formed sentences, word-lists lack syntactic structure, and therefore do not permit for a meaningful integration of structural cues with, for instance, lexico-semantic information.…”
Section: Indexsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Given the association between MTG activity and lexical-semantic processing (Friederici, 2012;Hagoort, 2017), the effect in MTG could reflect the build-up of richer semantic representations as sentences progress, more so than during the progression of word-lists. The absence of an effect of index in word-lists in the angular gyrus may be consistent with the view that this region is a hub to integrate different types of information extracted by various parts of the language network (Binder & Desai, 2011;Hagoort, 2003Hagoort, , 2019. In contrast to unfolding well-formed sentences, word-lists lack syntactic structure, and therefore do not permit for a meaningful integration of structural cues with, for instance, lexico-semantic information.…”
Section: Indexsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The terms "festive" and "violent" can be understood differently depending on the context and interpretational meaning. The debate on whether and how linguistic data are a part of a complex interpretational structure and how they can be implemented in the mind of the participants remain largely unknown (Hagoort, 2020;Martin and Baggio, 2020). In this perspective, we propose a protocol inspired by Gregory Bateson's analysis of double framing (Bateson, 1955).…”
Section: Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive linguistics theory is now definitely able to find its way on the basis of cognitive terms. It became possible to concentrate on the basic features of the vocabulary, allowing to show its nature and relationship from a cognitive and communicative point of view Hagoort (2019) found that meanings have multiple sides; However, one needs to make a separation between the meanings of a single word (the lexical meaning) and the meanings of a multi-word pronunciation. Polyphonic words cannot be retrieved from memory but must be constructed quickly.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%