Understanding Digital Humanities 2012
DOI: 10.1057/9780230371934_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meaning and the Mining of Legal Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, in the study indicated, a specific method of unsupervised latent trait scaling was used to discern latent traits of legal traditions in government budgetary legislation in 13 countries by means of examining the texts of this legislation. Big Data research has been evolving within legal research proper (see, for instance, Hildebrandt, 2012; Surden, 2014), but the study that this article has examined indicates re-orientation within political science research on government budgeting and legal policy-making rather than legal studies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More specifically, in the study indicated, a specific method of unsupervised latent trait scaling was used to discern latent traits of legal traditions in government budgetary legislation in 13 countries by means of examining the texts of this legislation. Big Data research has been evolving within legal research proper (see, for instance, Hildebrandt, 2012; Surden, 2014), but the study that this article has examined indicates re-orientation within political science research on government budgeting and legal policy-making rather than legal studies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4 Afterrecognizingandanalysinghumanbehaviour,thenextstepisinfluencingthatbehaviourby, forexample,persuasivetechnology.Persuasivetechnologyusesinsightsfrompsychology,behavioural sciencesandhuman-computerinteraction,todesignsystemsthatencourageuserstochangetheir behaviour(Fogg2002).Thistypeoftechnologicalbehaviourinfluencing-alsocallednudging-is becomingmoreandmoresophisticated.ThinkofFacebook'semotionstudy,whichrevealedthat showinguserspositiveornegativeinformationaffectstheirmood.Consequently,userspostmore positiveornegativethings.Thestudycausedquiteacommotionamonguserswhentheyrealisedthat theyhadunwittinglybeenpartofanexperiment(Flick2016).Theinconspicuouspersonalizingof searchbehaviourbysearchenginessuchasGoogleisalsoanexampleofsubtleinfluencing. Hildebrandt(2012;…”
Section: Digitization Of the Biological Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparent exploratory and properly tested confirmatory machine learning can be a means to provide feedback to lawyers, clients, prosecutors, courts. 8 In previous work I made six recommendations for the use of ML in law, five of which were based on the work of Sculley & Pasanek [41] on the use of ML in literary theory [42] (p. 157):…”
Section: Algorithmic Regulation Under the Rule Of Law: From Agnostic To Agonistic Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%