The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured rater × ratee designs.

Hönekopp, Johannes; Becker, Betsy Jane; Oswald, Frederick L.

doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.1.72

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 90 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To verify these assumptions, I ran a 3 ϫ 3 mixedfactor ANOVA with faces as the unit of analysis (Hönekopp, Becker, & Oswald, 2006). Thus, race of judge was a within-unit factor, and race of face was a between-units factor.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.

Hönekopp¹

2006

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

Self Cite

200

261

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Misconstruing the meaning of Cronbach's alpha, experts on facial attractiveness have conveyed the impression that facial-attractiveness judgment standards are largely shared. This claim is unsubstantiated, because information necessary for deciding whether judgments of facial attractiveness are more influenced by commonly shared or by privately held evaluation standards is lacking. Three experiments, using diverse face and rater samples to investigate the relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness, are reported. These experiments show that for a variety of ancillary conditions, and contrary to the prevalent notion in the literature, private taste is about as powerful as shared taste. Important implications for scientific research strategy and laypeople's self-esteem are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.

Hönekopp¹

2006

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

Self Cite

200

261

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As Hanel & Mehler (2019) demonstrated, the CLES may be a more intuitive description of the signal-to-noise SMD. While our personal recommendation leans towards the use of magnitude-based SMDs and CLES, it is up to the individual sport and exercise scientist to decide what effect size they feel is most appropriate for the data they are analyzing and point they are trying to communicate ( Hönekopp, Becker & Oswald, 2006 ).…”

Section: Recommendations For Reporting Effect Sizesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A case against default effect sizes in sport and exercise science

Caldwell

Vigotsky

2020

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent discussions in the sport and exercise science community have focused on the appropriate use and reporting of effect sizes. Sport and exercise scientists often analyze repeated-measures data, from which mean differences are reported. To aid the interpretation of these data, standardized mean differences (SMD) are commonly reported as a description of effect size. In this manuscript, we hope to alleviate some confusion. First, we provide a philosophical framework for conceptualizing SMDs; that is, by dichotomizing them into two groups: magnitude-based and signal-to-noise SMDs. Second, we describe the statistical properties of SMDs and their implications. Finally, we provide high-level recommendations for how sport and exercise scientists can thoughtfully report raw effect sizes, SMDs, or other effect sizes for their own studies. This conceptual framework provides sport and exercise scientists with the background necessary to make and justify their choice of an SMD.

show abstract

“…Here, positive effect sizes indicate an amelioration of drinking outcomes over time while negative effect sizes indicate a worsening. Effect sizes derived from test statistics may conflate the magnitude of an effect and its homogeneity across participants [31] and to avoid this we computed d directly from means and standard deviations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Progressive stage transition does mean getting better: a further test of the Transtheoretical Model in recovery from alcohol problems

Heather¹,

Hönekopp²,

Smailes³

2009

Addiction

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To test two central assumptions of the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) regarding recovery from alcohol problems: (1) individuals making a forward transition from pre-action to action stages will show greater drinking improvements than those remaining in pre-action stages ; and (2) individuals remaining in pre-action stages will not demonstrate improvements in drinking outcomes.Design and setting Large, multi-centre, RCT of treatment for alcohol problems (UKATT).Measurements Stage of change, drinks per drinking day (DDD) and percentage days abstinent (PDA) at baseline, three months and 12 months follow-up. FindingsIn support of TTM assumption 1, improvements in drinking outcomes were consistently greater among clients who showed a forward stage transition (d = 0.68) than among those who did not (d = 0.10). Two tests of assumption 2 showed a significant improvement in drinking outcomes in non-transition groups, inconsistent with the TTM, one test showed a significant deterioration and the other showed equivalent drinking outcomes across time. An explanation is offered why, under the relevant assumption of the TTM, clients in non-transition groups showed small changes in drinking outcomes.Conclusions In contrast to a previous study by Callaghan and colleagues, our findings largely support the TTM account of recovery from alcohol problems in treatment. The discrepancy can be explained by the use in our study of a more reliable and valid method for assigning stage of change.

show abstract

The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured rater × ratee designs.

Cited by 15 publications

References 90 publications

Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.

Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.

A case against default effect sizes in sport and exercise science

Progressive stage transition does mean getting better: a further test of the Transtheoretical Model in recovery from alcohol problems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About