2014
DOI: 10.4064/aa164-2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mean square of the divisor function

Abstract: Let d(n) be the divisor function. In 1916, S. Ramanujan stated but without proof that n≤x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Lemma 3.1 is motivated by the methods used in dealing with the Dirichlet divisor problem, see e.g. [6]. In the above proof, we combine analytic methods with hyperbolic trick and van der Corput bounds.…”
Section: Key Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Lemma 3.1 is motivated by the methods used in dealing with the Dirichlet divisor problem, see e.g. [6]. In the above proof, we combine analytic methods with hyperbolic trick and van der Corput bounds.…”
Section: Key Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an improvement of (7.3), the readers are referred to [JiSa14]. As such it looks to be a challenging problem to reduce the exponent 5 of the factor log x in (7.3).…”
Section: The Upper Bound Of |ζ(1 + It)|mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (10) implies that τ ∞ (n) is even for n = 1. Then for p > 2, a > 1 the value of σ (e)∞ (p a ) is a sum of even number of odd summands and is even.…”
Section: E-∞-perfect Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%