2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40192-016-0051-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MEAM parameter calibration tool: an explicit methodology for hierarchical bridging between ab initio and atomistic scales

Abstract: We developed a software package that incorporates integrated computational materials engineering principles to enable rapid development of new state-of-the-art atomistic potentials for metal behavior driven by ab initio and experimental data. The software features hand-tuning abilities as well as automated calibration of parameters to flexible target properties. Molecular statics simulations of target properties are done using a built-in LAMMPS library module to boost performance. The potential calibration met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation energies, lattice constants, 0 K elastic constants, vacancy and defect energies, surface energies, and generalized stacking fault energies for both phases and the c/a ratio of the hcp phase for the new potential were found using the MEAM parameter calibration tool [38][39][40]. Formation energies and lattice constants are determined by performing a conjugate gradient minimization of the energy for a unit cell of the structure in question and allowing the cell shape to relax to the lowest energy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation energies, lattice constants, 0 K elastic constants, vacancy and defect energies, surface energies, and generalized stacking fault energies for both phases and the c/a ratio of the hcp phase for the new potential were found using the MEAM parameter calibration tool [38][39][40]. Formation energies and lattice constants are determined by performing a conjugate gradient minimization of the energy for a unit cell of the structure in question and allowing the cell shape to relax to the lowest energy.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function φ i j (r i j ) is defined as the pair interaction contribution between i and j atoms, separated by the distance r i j , while S i j is a screening function. The fitting process was done by using the open-source M-EAM parameter calibration (MPC) tool [30] to reproduce DFT data that serves as input data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the significant difference is shown between the DFT and experiment data, the experimental data were choosing to fit with. The calibration of MEAM parameters was done using the MEAM parameter calibration tool (MPC) [28][29][30], while dynamic simulations of the potential were performed using LAMMPS, an open source molecular dynamics software developed by Sandia National Laboratories for material modeling [31]. The DFT calculations were performed using QUANTUM ESPRESSO [32].…”
Section: Theory Computational Methods and Potential Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%