1985
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1985.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mating system and genetic structure in a perennial grass, Cynosurus cristatus L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such investigations have often, but not always, revealed significant departures from random spatial distribution of genotypes. For example, Schaal (1975) and Epperson and Clegg (1986) detected significant spatial association of genotypes in Liatris cylindracea and Ipomoea purpurea, but Ennos (1985), Epperson and Allard (1989) and Dewey and Heywood (1988) failed to find strong evidence of non-random spatial distribution of genotypes in populations of the grass Cynosurus cristatus, the lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and the tropical tree Psychotria nervosci, respectively. Significant departure from random spatial distribution of genotypes can be due to spatially-varying selection and/or to local dispersal of genes (Turner, Stephens, and Anderson, 1982;Bradshaw, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such investigations have often, but not always, revealed significant departures from random spatial distribution of genotypes. For example, Schaal (1975) and Epperson and Clegg (1986) detected significant spatial association of genotypes in Liatris cylindracea and Ipomoea purpurea, but Ennos (1985), Epperson and Allard (1989) and Dewey and Heywood (1988) failed to find strong evidence of non-random spatial distribution of genotypes in populations of the grass Cynosurus cristatus, the lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and the tropical tree Psychotria nervosci, respectively. Significant departure from random spatial distribution of genotypes can be due to spatially-varying selection and/or to local dispersal of genes (Turner, Stephens, and Anderson, 1982;Bradshaw, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations of population substructure in plants have relied upon the study of the spatial distribution of conspicuous polymorphisms (Epling and Dobzhansky, 1942;Wright, 1943Wright, , 1978Epperson and Clegg, 1986), as well as that of electrophoretically-detectable variation (Hamrick and Allard, 1972;Schaal, 1975;Ennos, 1985;Waser, 1987;Dewey and Heywood, 1988;Epperson and Allard, 1989). Such investigations have often, but not always, revealed significant departures from random spatial distribution of genotypes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between population structure and the mating system have been investigated in several experimental (Ennos andClegg, 1982, 1985;Ellstrand and Foster, 1983) and natural plant populations (Brown eta!., 1975;Linhart et al, 1981;Shaw and Allard, 1981;Neale and Adams, 1985;Ritland and Ganders, 1985;Shea, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most measurements come from crop populations (e.g., Handel, 1982Handel, , 1983Levin, 1984;Levin and Kerster, 1974), some from natural species or situations (e.g., Schaal, 1975Schaal, , 1980Levin, 1981;Ennos and Clegg, 1982;Bos et a!., 1985;Ennos, 1985). The genetic variability of plant characters which influence the amount of gene flow between populations within a species, and which therefore may be of importance for the speed of evolution, is not well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%