2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46298-1_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The $$\mathrm {GURA_G}$$ GURA G Administrative Model for User and Group Attribute Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest challenge of applying the ABAC model to the IoT is attribute assignment . To improve the flexibility of access controls and the efficiency of attribute assignment, Servos AND Osborn and Gupta and Sandhu proposed Hierarchical Group and Attribute‐Based Access Control models (HGABAC) and an Administration Model for HGABAC (GURAG). Attribute inheritance relations are introduced through user groups and object groups, and an attribute distribution mechanism for users and user groups is provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greatest challenge of applying the ABAC model to the IoT is attribute assignment . To improve the flexibility of access controls and the efficiency of attribute assignment, Servos AND Osborn and Gupta and Sandhu proposed Hierarchical Group and Attribute‐Based Access Control models (HGABAC) and an Administration Model for HGABAC (GURAG). Attribute inheritance relations are introduced through user groups and object groups, and an attribute distribution mechanism for users and user groups is provided.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest challenge of applying the ABAC model to the IoT is attribute assignment. 12 To improve the flexibility of access controls and the efficiency of attribute assignment, Servos AND Osborn 13 and Gupta and Sandhu 14 proposed…”
Section: Iot Access Control Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributebased authorization policies are used to determine access permissions of users on services and objects. With group hierarchy, senior groups inherit attributes from junior groups [20], and a user assigned to senior groups gets all attributes of group besides its direct attributes. A set of environment attributes is also added to incorporate contextual information (like access time, threat level) in policies.…”
Section: Attributes Based Extensions To Ot-rbacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roles of the user will change based on the user's current attributes as well as current environment attributes. As shown in Figure 6, OT-RBAC model can be configured to achieve dynamic roles assignment to users based on the direct or inherited attributes through group memberships [20]. We can further extend the use of attributes for dynamic permissions assignment to roles based on object tags, environment attribute values and operations.…”
Section: Dynamic Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar, is the case for objects where objects having same properties and characteristics can be grouped into one object group. In addition to directly assigned attribute-value pairs, these groups also have hierar- Figure 1: An Example of User Group Hierarchy Adapted from [30] chy among them which results in attribute inheritance. A group hierarchy is a partial order relation written as g where senior groups acquire all attribute values assigned to the groups junior to them, along with their own directly assigned attribute values.…”
Section: Group Attributes and Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%