2021
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/11017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mathematics Performance of Aboriginal Pupils for Computation and Word Problem Items in Using Academic and Community Languages

Abstract: This comparative research study examined Grade Five Malaysian Aboriginal pupils' mathematical performance on 30 computation and 20 word problem items in the academic Malay language and community Temiar language. The items were constructed in the Malay language before adapting and audio recording into the Temiar language using experienced Mathematics teachers and native speakers. One test consisting of monolingual test items written in Malay language (MAL) and, another bilingual test with audio test items in Te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This surprising result contradicted with many studies on medium of instruction used in mathematics classroom (i.e. Dahm & De Angelis, 2018;Shanmugam et al, 2021), even though it was supported by the claim made by Mouw et al (2019) in which both native and non-native language speakers would benefit from learning mathematics in heterogeneous groups based on ethnicity. Thus, a follow-up study could be conducted in the future to explain this unexpected finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…This surprising result contradicted with many studies on medium of instruction used in mathematics classroom (i.e. Dahm & De Angelis, 2018;Shanmugam et al, 2021), even though it was supported by the claim made by Mouw et al (2019) in which both native and non-native language speakers would benefit from learning mathematics in heterogeneous groups based on ethnicity. Thus, a follow-up study could be conducted in the future to explain this unexpected finding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%