2021
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mathematical foundations of anelasticity: existence of smooth global intermediate configurations

Abstract: A central tool of nonlinear anelasticity is the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation tensor that assumes that the deformation gradient can be decomposed as a product of an elastic and an anelastic tensor. It is usually justified by the existence of an intermediate configuration. Yet, this configuration cannot exist in Euclidean space, in general, and the mathematical basis for this assumption is on unsatisfactory ground. Here, we derive a sufficient condition for the existence of global intermediate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this theoretical framework, the material deformation due to the interaction between external stimuli and mechanical loads can be expressed as a composite deformation from a reference configuration to the current configuration, via an elastic deformation followed by a natural (stress free) shape change. The multiplicative decomposition of the associated gradient tensor is similar in some respects to those found in the constitutive theories of thermoelasticity, elastoplasticity, and growth [47,63] (see also [46,92]), but is different on one major aspect, namely: the stress-free geometrical change is superposed on the elastic deformation, which is applied directly to the reference state. This difference is important since, although the elastic configuration obtained by this deformation may not be observed in practice, it may still be possible for the nematic body to assume such a configuration under suitable external stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Within this theoretical framework, the material deformation due to the interaction between external stimuli and mechanical loads can be expressed as a composite deformation from a reference configuration to the current configuration, via an elastic deformation followed by a natural (stress free) shape change. The multiplicative decomposition of the associated gradient tensor is similar in some respects to those found in the constitutive theories of thermoelasticity, elastoplasticity, and growth [47,63] (see also [46,92]), but is different on one major aspect, namely: the stress-free geometrical change is superposed on the elastic deformation, which is applied directly to the reference state. This difference is important since, although the elastic configuration obtained by this deformation may not be observed in practice, it may still be possible for the nematic body to assume such a configuration under suitable external stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Here, we assume the existence of an isotropic phase that can be reached from a suitably imprinted defect field in the original fabrication process. The exact conditions under which such an intermediary configuration can be mapped to a stressfree reference configuration that is isotropic has been discussed in the general framework of anelasticity in [18]. In (3), a > 0 represents a temperature-dependent stretch parameter, ⊗ denotes the tensor product of two vectors, and I = diag(1, 1, 1) is the second-order identity tensor.…”
Section: A Continuum Model For Ideal Nematic Elastomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exploit theoretically the multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient from the reference configuration to the current configuration into an elastic distortion followed by a natural shape change [20,[41][42][43][44]. This multiplicative decomposition is similar to those found in the constitutive theories of thermoelasticity, elastoplasticity, and morphoelasticity [19,37] (see [18,53] as well), but it is also different in the sense that the stress-free geometric change is superposed on the elastic deformation, which is directly applied to the reference state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nonlinear anelasticity, in the notion first defined in [7], strain has an elastic and an anelastic part. In terms of deformation gradient it is written as F = F e F a , where F e and F a are the elastic and anelastic deformation tensors, respectively [17,37,39]. The hybrid German-English portmanteau term eigenstrain has its origin in the pioneering paper of Hans Reissner [31] (Eigenspannung means proper or self stress) and was further popularized by Mura [25,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%