2007
DOI: 10.1155/2007/92780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mathematical Foundations of 3D Compton Scatter Emission Imaging

Abstract: The mathematical principles of tomographic imaging using detected (unscattered) X- or gamma-rays are based on the two-dimensional Radon transform and many of its variants. In this paper, we show that two new generalizations, called conical Radon transforms, are related to three-dimensional imaging processes based on detected Compton scattered radiation. The first class of conical Radon transform has been introduced recently to support imaging principles of collimated detector systems. The second class is new a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured photon flux density at the detector site is a sum of conical projections (Fig. 3) and is called compounded conical projections [22], [23]. It should be noted that data acquisition no longer requires to rotate the detector in space (as it is done in a conventional emission imaging).…”
Section: How Are Scattered Photons Used?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured photon flux density at the detector site is a sum of conical projections (Fig. 3) and is called compounded conical projections [22], [23]. It should be noted that data acquisition no longer requires to rotate the detector in space (as it is done in a conventional emission imaging).…”
Section: How Are Scattered Photons Used?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical expression of one arbitrary conical projection is quite involved and given in [23]. The summation over all such objects can be still expressed as a linear integral transform of the activity density (5) Unfortunately, the explicit form of is too complicated to yield a simple interpretation, and will not be addressed here.…”
Section: How To Increase Sensitivity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several inversion formulas for various types of cone transforms were derived in [2,5,6,11,12,13,16,19,21,24,25,28,31,34]. The cone transform with planar vertex positions and a fixed central axis was studied in [5,6,16,21,24,25,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cone transform with planar vertex positions and a fixed central axis was studied in [5,6,16,21,24,25,34]. Haltme ier derived an exact backprojection-type inversion formula for the n-dimensional cone transform which integrates a given n-dimensional function over all conical surfaces having vertices on a hyperplane and a central axis orthogonal to this hyperplane in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this Basko transform is in fact a V-line Radon transform with swinging axis around a detection site whereas the one considered here has a fixed axis direction [4]. The Vline Radon transform is also considered as a two-dimensional version of the Conical Radon Transform (CRT ) which have been introduced some years ago ( [5], [10], [11], [12], [13]). These generalized Radon transforms (T V and CRT ) have numerous applications in imaging science, in particular in new Compton scattering emission imaging ( [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%