2018
DOI: 10.1159/000487977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maternal Ecology of Breastfeeding: A Life Course Developmental Perspective

Abstract: Background/Aims: For mothers in high-income country contexts, infant feeding represents one of the most fundamental and challenging aspects of the transition to parenthood. We present a specific theoretical model, based on life course theory principles, to explicate how the maternal ecology influences breastfeeding behaviors throughout the early parenting years. Methods: Core concepts and suppositions draw from a review of extant theories for the development of infant feeding behaviors, including intraindividu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-occupation has been defined in the literature as the give-and-take between caregivers and infants engaged in a mutual task, such as feeding, including shared physicality, emotionality, and intentionality [ 15 ]. Contemporary theoretical models such as life course theory suggest that these fluid dyadic processes are dependent on both maternal and infant individual differences and the dyadic behaviors themselves, which evolve over context and time [ 16 ]. In particular, pre- and postnatal maternal mental health may impact women’s ability and willingness to breastfeed [ 17 , 18 ] especially based on differences in infants’ temperament and/or responsivity, which may reciprocally affect the quality of maternal-infant interactions, bonding, and ability/willingness to continue breastfeeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-occupation has been defined in the literature as the give-and-take between caregivers and infants engaged in a mutual task, such as feeding, including shared physicality, emotionality, and intentionality [ 15 ]. Contemporary theoretical models such as life course theory suggest that these fluid dyadic processes are dependent on both maternal and infant individual differences and the dyadic behaviors themselves, which evolve over context and time [ 16 ]. In particular, pre- and postnatal maternal mental health may impact women’s ability and willingness to breastfeed [ 17 , 18 ] especially based on differences in infants’ temperament and/or responsivity, which may reciprocally affect the quality of maternal-infant interactions, bonding, and ability/willingness to continue breastfeeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, the structure of the data limits the ability to examine all breast-feeding relationships for a given mother. Thus, even though we approach the examination of PIM from a life course perspective (21) , we are unable to speak to the whole of the reproductive life coursemerely a 6-year portion of it for each mother. Future studies, perhaps with follow-up spanning the entire reproductive life course, are needed to corroborate, clarify and extend these findings.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of whether there is a sleeper effect of PIM has not been adequately studied in the literature; generally, each breast-feeding relationship is considered in isolation (20) . However, by studying breast-feeding as a developmental phenomenon, situated in the maternal life course, we may better understand how mothers decide to feed their infants over time (21) . As recent theory work has described, situating breast-feeding decision-making in the maternal life course has many benefits, including the discovery of underexamined, and thus underutilised, levers of breast-feeding promotion and support (21) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative studies have also examined and quantified the predictors of breastfeeding “success” but are less likely to do so using breastfeeding trajectory as the marker of that success (Whipps, Yoshikawa, & Godfrey, ). At the same time, there are limitations to studying trajectories using strictly qualitative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%