2014
DOI: 10.4102/hts.v70i1.2116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The material turn in Religious Studies and the possibility of critique: Assessing Chidester’s analysis of ‘the fetish’

Abstract: How to cite this article: Strijdom, J., 2014, 'The material turn in Religious Studies and the possibility of critique: Assessing Chidester's analysis of "the fetish"', HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 70(1), Art. #2116, 7 pages. The material turn in Religious Studies and the possibility of critique: Assessing Chidester's analysis of 'the fetish'In recent debates the neglect of the material dimension of religion and the foregrounding of beliefs in the modern academic study of religion has been attribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The chapter understands materiality and things in the context of the material turn, an analytical framework which proposes that we take as an entry point for our study of religion-specific, concrete visualities, for example, a) objects like relics, amulets, dress, painted or sculpted images, written words, and architectural spaces; b) feelings and sensory experiences like seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching, as our emotions are related to what happens to objects we feel related to; and c) bodily performances in specific gestures, rituals, ceremonies, and festivals (Houtman and Meyer 2012;Strijdom 2014).…”
Section: Materiality Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chapter understands materiality and things in the context of the material turn, an analytical framework which proposes that we take as an entry point for our study of religion-specific, concrete visualities, for example, a) objects like relics, amulets, dress, painted or sculpted images, written words, and architectural spaces; b) feelings and sensory experiences like seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching, as our emotions are related to what happens to objects we feel related to; and c) bodily performances in specific gestures, rituals, ceremonies, and festivals (Houtman and Meyer 2012;Strijdom 2014).…”
Section: Materiality Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mālā 7 semantika un simbolika nav tik komplicētas kā mani gadījumā. 11 Lūgšanu krelles neatsauc atmiņā kosmosa uzbūvi un nesaistās ar debesu spīdekļu simboliku, un tomēr šim rituālajam objektam ir vērts īsi pievērsties. Lūgšanu krelles izmanto daudzu reliģisko tradīciju pārstāvji, to skaitā kristieši.…”
Section: Lūgšanu Krelles Un Galvaskausiunclassified
“…Partiendo de esta evidencia empírica y del "giro material" en el estudio de la religión (36,37,38) , ponemos el acento en estudiar las negociaciones materiales que subyacen en la creación y el diseño de estos espacios religiosos. Es decir, identificar cómo la idea de "multiconfesionalidad" se traduce en términos materiales en la creación y diseño de estos espacios religiosos innovadores.…”
Section: Religión Contexto Hospitalario Y Espacios Multiconfesionalesunclassified