2015
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1421397112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The massive mitochondrial genome of the angiosperm Silene noctiflora is evolving by gain or loss of entire chromosomes

Abstract: Across eukaryotes, mitochondria exhibit staggering diversity in genomic architecture, including the repeated evolution of multichromosomal structures. Unlike in the nucleus, where mitosis and meiosis ensure faithful transmission of chromosomes, the mechanisms of inheritance in fragmented mitochondrial genomes remain mysterious. Multichromosomal mitochondrial genomes have recently been found in multiple species of flowering plants, including Silene noctiflora, which harbors an unusually large and complex mitoch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
106
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
106
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, 20 of the 59 chromosomes in Silene noctiflora, 86 of the 128 chromosomes in S. conica (Sloan et al, 2012), and the two smaller chromosomes of cucumber (Alverson et al, 2011) bear no intact genes. The existence of possibly noncoding chromosomes raises questions about their origin and perpetuation, for which both neutral and adaptive explanations have been advanced, but the questions remain unanswered (Alverson et al, 2011;Sloan et al, 2012;Rice et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2015). Adaptive hypotheses for the existence of noncoding chromosomes suggest the presence of unidentified genes or regulatory regions that are functionally relevant and are maintained by natural selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, 20 of the 59 chromosomes in Silene noctiflora, 86 of the 128 chromosomes in S. conica (Sloan et al, 2012), and the two smaller chromosomes of cucumber (Alverson et al, 2011) bear no intact genes. The existence of possibly noncoding chromosomes raises questions about their origin and perpetuation, for which both neutral and adaptive explanations have been advanced, but the questions remain unanswered (Alverson et al, 2011;Sloan et al, 2012;Rice et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2015). Adaptive hypotheses for the existence of noncoding chromosomes suggest the presence of unidentified genes or regulatory regions that are functionally relevant and are maintained by natural selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive hypotheses for the existence of noncoding chromosomes suggest the presence of unidentified genes or regulatory regions that are functionally relevant and are maintained by natural selection. Alternatively, gene-lacking chromosomes may replicate and be perpetuated by genetic drift (or even selfishly) as a result of an insignificant fitness cost on the organism (Sloan et al, 2012;Wu et al, 2015). A population study of S. noctiflora revealed some differences in the presence/absence of chromosomes that lack any identifiable genes (Wu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metazoan mtDNA is usually very compact: there are generally no introns, little or no intergenic DNA, and most genes show clear signatures of selection for small size [1,2]. Nevertheless, fragmentation of the “standard” single-circle mtDNA into multichromosomal genomes, which is common in higher plants [3,4], has occurred independently in some metazoans as well: nematodes [5], mesozoans [6], cnidaria [7], insects [8], and some monogonont rotifers [9,10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colloquium was a collaboration between the US National Academy of Sciences and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, and spanned a wide range of overlapping themes in symbiosis: major evolutionary transitions and the nature of individuality (10-13); the mosaic phylogenetic nature of organelle proteomes (14)(15)(16)(17); the risks and costs associated with long-term endosymbiosis (18,19); the structure and dynamics of symbiont and organelle genomes (20)(21)(22); the metabolic complexities that develop during the establishment and integration of endosymbionts (23-31); and how endosymbiosis has been understood in the history of biology and how it might be thought of in the future (32,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%