2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The massive binary CPD - 41° 7742

Abstract: In the first paper of this series, we presented a detailed high-resolution spectroscopic study of CPD − 41 • 7742, deriving for the first time an orbital solution for both components of the system. In this second paper, we focus on the analysis of the optical light curve and on recent XMM-Newton X-ray observations. In the optical, the system presents two eclipses, yielding an inclination i ∼ 77 •. Combining the constraints from the photometry with the results of our previous work, we derive the absolute parame… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
47
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(50 reference statements)
10
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the distance to NGC 6231 as V 0 − M V = 11.0 mag. This value is in excellent agreement with the value obtained by Sana et al (2005). Although there is a slight difference in the adopted reddening law, this value is identical to the value obtained by SBL98 and adopted by Sana et al (2006).…”
Section: Color-magnitude Diagrams and Distancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We adopt the distance to NGC 6231 as V 0 − M V = 11.0 mag. This value is in excellent agreement with the value obtained by Sana et al (2005). Although there is a slight difference in the adopted reddening law, this value is identical to the value obtained by SBL98 and adopted by Sana et al (2006).…”
Section: Color-magnitude Diagrams and Distancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The collision of the primary wind with the secondary surface could generate an X-ray emission associated with the secondary inner surface. The short timescale X-ray variability could then result from occultation effects very much like those observed for CPD−41 • 7742 (Sana et al 2005). Though this scenario seems to agree with the results of the Doppler tomography where we have seen that the emission is only due to the primary star, the position of the contact zone remains unknown because the wind parameters of the secondary star are uncertain.…”
Section: Colliding Wind and Non-thermal Radio Emissionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…(a) Boyajian et al (2007); (b) Maíz-Apellániz et al (2004); (c) Sana et al (2013); (d) Sana et al (2012); (e) Rauw et al (2012); (f) De Becker et al (2012); (g) Sota et al (2014); (1) Kaltcheva & Hilditch (2000); (2) Smith (2006); (3) Herbst & Havlen (1977); (4) Sana et al (2005); (5) Sung et al (2013); (6) Prisinzano et al (2005); (7) Ibanoglu et al (2013); (8) Dufton et al (2006); (9) Benaglia et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%