2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mass–Metallicity Relation at z ∼ 0.8: Redshift Evolution and Parameter Dependency

Abstract: The spectra of emission-line galaxies (ELGs) from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) of the Sloan Digit Sky Survey (SDSS) are used to study the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) at z ∼ 0.8. The selected sample contains about 180,000 massive star-forming galaxies with 0.6 < z < 1.05 and 9 < log(M ⋆ /M ⊙ ) < 12. The spectra are stacked in bins of different parameters including redshift, stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), specific star formation rate (sSFR), halflight radius, mass de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
11
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This high signal-to-noise spectrum, along with smaller aperture emission line measurements from Hubble Space Telescope and quasar absorption line observations, can all be explained by a selfconsistent outflow model. The ELG spectra of roughly 180,000 galaxies were further investigated to constrain the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift (Huang et al 2019). The results indicate that the 0.6 < z < 1.05 ELGs follow the fundamental metallicity relation that is observed in the local universe.…”
Section: Beyond Cosmology: Astrophysics Results Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This high signal-to-noise spectrum, along with smaller aperture emission line measurements from Hubble Space Telescope and quasar absorption line observations, can all be explained by a selfconsistent outflow model. The ELG spectra of roughly 180,000 galaxies were further investigated to constrain the mass-metallicity relation at high redshift (Huang et al 2019). The results indicate that the 0.6 < z < 1.05 ELGs follow the fundamental metallicity relation that is observed in the local universe.…”
Section: Beyond Cosmology: Astrophysics Results Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…that there is a socalled FMR (e.g. Richard et al 2011;Nakajima et al 2012;Huang et al 2019). One of the successes of the gas-regulator model presented by Lilly et al (2013) was to provide a natural analytic explanation for the presence of SFR as a second parameter and even to predict that the Z(M * , SFR) relation could well be more or less epoch independent.…”
Section: Galactic Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that the apparent evolution in the MZR could be accounted for, phenomenologically, by the higher SFR encountered in high redshift galaxies. This universal Z gas (M * , SFR) is therefore known as the "fundamental metallicity relation" (FMR; Mannucci et al 2010;Richard et al 2011;Nakajima et al 2012;Cresci et al 2012;Salim et al 2014;Cresci et al 2019;Huang et al 2019;Curti et al 2020). Cresci et al (2019) finds that the anti-correlation between specific SFR and gas-phase metallicity at given stellar mass, regardless of what the metallicity and SFR indicators are used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that in the steady-state, both the gas surface density Σ gas (r) and the metallicity Z(r) of the gas disk will not evolve with time (Bouché et al 2010;Lilly et al 2013;Wang & Lilly 2021, also see Paper I). However, we know this may not be true for SF galaxies on cosmological timescales, since strong evolutions of SFR and gas-phase metallicity are seen from observations (Croom et al 2012;Bundy et al 2015;Huang et al 2019;Gillman et al 2021), especially at high redshift. We will consider the case of cosmological evolution in our framework in Section 4 below.…”
Section: The Predicted Steady-statementioning
confidence: 91%