2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mass discrepancy in intermediate- and high-mass eclipsing binaries: The need for higher convective core masses

Abstract: Context. Eclipsing, spectroscopic double-lined binary star systems (SB2) are excellent laboratories for calibrating theories of stellar interior structure and evolution. Their precise and accurate masses and radii measured from binary dynamics offer model-independent constraints and challenge current theories of stellar evolution. Aims. We aim to investigate the mass discrepancy in binary stars. This is the significant difference between stellar components' masses measured from binary dynamics and those inferr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
99
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
13
99
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is often significant disagreement between the masses of O and B stars inferred from spectroscopy and stellar evolution theory, versus dynamical masses measurements in binary systems. This E-mail: astro.js@keele.ac.uk mass discrepancy was identified by Herrero et al (1992) and has been explained by invoking varying amounts of near-core mixing (Guinan et al 2000;Tkachenko et al 2014Tkachenko et al , 2016Tkachenko et al , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, there is often significant disagreement between the masses of O and B stars inferred from spectroscopy and stellar evolution theory, versus dynamical masses measurements in binary systems. This E-mail: astro.js@keele.ac.uk mass discrepancy was identified by Herrero et al (1992) and has been explained by invoking varying amounts of near-core mixing (Guinan et al 2000;Tkachenko et al 2014Tkachenko et al , 2016Tkachenko et al , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This is primarily because binary studies have the potential to provide masses and radii from the stars' relative orbital motion around a common center of mass. Moreover, accurate, absolute and model-independent masses and radii are achievable in the case of eclipsing binary systems (see e.g., Southworth et al, 2020 andTkachenko et al, 2020) owing to the ability to simultaneously model spectroscopic radial velocities together with the eclipse depths in the light curve of a binary system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two more used methods are either the width of the main sequence in an HR diagram (Herwig, 2000;Bressan et al, 2012;Ekström et al, 2012;Choi et al, 2016), or the velocity drop at the end of the main sequence (Brott et al, 2011a). More recently, it has been proposed to calibrate the overshoot on binary stars systems (Tkachenko et al, 2020). Some studies indicate that there could be a dependence of the overshoot with the mass of the star (see for example Castro et al, 2014;Claret and Torres, 2016), and so using a fixed value would lead either to overestimate the overshoot in the lower mass domain, or to underestimate it in the higher mass domain.…”
Section: Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%