2002
DOI: 10.1039/b202491h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mass accommodation coefficient of ozone on an aqueous surface

Abstract: A wetted-wall cylindrical flow reactor was used to measure uptake coefficients, g, of O 3 on aqueous surfaces at 293 K. The loss of O 3 from the gas-phase following contact with varying areas of aqueous surface was determined by UV absorption. The use of Na 2 S 2 O 3 as an aqueous-phase scavenger for O 3 ensured that uptake coefficients were in a reaction-controlled rather than mass accommodation-controlled regime. Observed uptake coefficients were corrected for radial gas-diffusion to yield values of g corr. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
55
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(31 reference statements)
7
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results have been obtained using textbook [ Seinfeld and Pandis , 1998] values for the various constants (rate constants, disassociation constants, Henry's Law coefficients, and diffusivities at 298 K). The value of the accommodation coefficients for SO 2 was taken to be 0.2 and for ozone the value was 0.04, in keeping with that suggested by Müller and Heal [2002]. It must be stressed that the values of [S(IV)] S and [O 3 ] S shown by the solid lines in Figure 2 are the values at the surface of the droplet However, because of the high concentration of S(IV) and the speed of the reaction at high pH, the O 3 concentration within the interior of the droplet can be severely depleted; that is, Q can become very small at high pH, whereas the fractional decrease in [S(IV)] caused by the reaction with O 3 is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These results have been obtained using textbook [ Seinfeld and Pandis , 1998] values for the various constants (rate constants, disassociation constants, Henry's Law coefficients, and diffusivities at 298 K). The value of the accommodation coefficients for SO 2 was taken to be 0.2 and for ozone the value was 0.04, in keeping with that suggested by Müller and Heal [2002]. It must be stressed that the values of [S(IV)] S and [O 3 ] S shown by the solid lines in Figure 2 are the values at the surface of the droplet However, because of the high concentration of S(IV) and the speed of the reaction at high pH, the O 3 concentration within the interior of the droplet can be severely depleted; that is, Q can become very small at high pH, whereas the fractional decrease in [S(IV)] caused by the reaction with O 3 is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The coefficient k mt accounts for the gas and interfacial mass transport limitations. R p is the radius of the droplet or aerosol particle, M O 3 is the molar mass of O 3 and α is the mass accommodation coefficient (4.0×10 −2 , Müller and Heal, 2002). In Eq.…”
Section: Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O 3 is reported to have variable mass accommodation coefficients (10 Ϫ3 -10 Ϫ2 ) on a pure air-water interface. 22,23 Similarly, PAHs also show small mass accommodation coefficients. 9,10 However, the presence of a PAH at the interface may increase the PAH-O 3 interaction at the airwater interface of a fog droplet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%