2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11009-014-9414-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Markov Additive Risk Process Under an Erlangized Dividend Barrier Strategy

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a Markov additive insurance risk process under a randomized dividend strategy in the spirit of Albrecher et al. (2011). Decisions on whether to pay dividends are only made at a sequence of dividend decision time points whose intervals are Erlang(n) distributed. At a dividend decision time, if the surplus level is larger than a predetermined dividend barrier, then the excess is paid as a dividend as long as ruin has not occurred. In contrast to Albrecher et al. (2011), it is assumed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the model dynamics of the taxed surplus process still follows X θ with the time of ruin now defined by τ c θ = inf {t > 0 : X θ t < 0}. Such a model assumption can be viewed as a complement to risk processes with periodic dividend barrier strategy and continuous monitoring of solvency, which were studied by Avanzi et al (2013Avanzi et al ( , 2014, Zhang (2014) and Zhang & Cheung (2014a, 2014b. In addition, one can also treat the present model as the reverse case of Albrecher & Ivanovs (2014, Section 6), which is concerned with Poissonian monitoring of ruin but continuous checking for tax payments.…”
Section: Continuous Monitoring Of Solvencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the model dynamics of the taxed surplus process still follows X θ with the time of ruin now defined by τ c θ = inf {t > 0 : X θ t < 0}. Such a model assumption can be viewed as a complement to risk processes with periodic dividend barrier strategy and continuous monitoring of solvency, which were studied by Avanzi et al (2013Avanzi et al ( , 2014, Zhang (2014) and Zhang & Cheung (2014a, 2014b. In addition, one can also treat the present model as the reverse case of Albrecher & Ivanovs (2014, Section 6), which is concerned with Poissonian monitoring of ruin but continuous checking for tax payments.…”
Section: Continuous Monitoring Of Solvencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A taxation system with delayed tax payment is also studied. In Section 4, we consider the situation where solvency is monitored continuously, but tax is still payable at Poissonian time points (see Avanzi et al (2013Avanzi et al ( , 2014, Zhang (2014) and Zhang & Cheung (2014a, 2014b for similar assumptions in dividend problems), and results analogous to those in Section 3 can readily be obtained. Section 5 ends the paper with some numerical illustrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, such a variant has been analyzed under perturbed compound Poisson and Markov additive insurance risk models by [44] and [45]. We remark that the reverse case with continuous dividend decisions and Poissonian monitoring of ruin was also studied by [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we shall consider the modifications as in [9] and [45] in the context of a spectrally negative Lévy risk process X. The dynamics of the modified surplus process, namely X b = {X b t } t≥0 , under a barrier-type strategy are described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation