2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The market reaction to green bond issuance: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, other studies find that investors appear to behave indifferently when choosing between green and conventional bonds from the United States (US) municipal sector over the period from June 2013 to July 2018 (Larcker and Watts 2020). 3 On the Chinese primary bond market, the risk premium on green bonds has an inverse relationship with an issuer's ability to signal credibility, such as the provision of third-party certification (Wang et al 2019), or an underwriter with a high social responsibility profile (Wang et al 2020). Furthermore, bond, issuer, and macroeconomic drivers of conventional bonds have similar effects on green bonds.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, other studies find that investors appear to behave indifferently when choosing between green and conventional bonds from the United States (US) municipal sector over the period from June 2013 to July 2018 (Larcker and Watts 2020). 3 On the Chinese primary bond market, the risk premium on green bonds has an inverse relationship with an issuer's ability to signal credibility, such as the provision of third-party certification (Wang et al 2019), or an underwriter with a high social responsibility profile (Wang et al 2020). Furthermore, bond, issuer, and macroeconomic drivers of conventional bonds have similar effects on green bonds.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: the bond rating, time of issuance, issue size, debt principal, nature of property rights, return on net assets of the issuer, and the prevailing market interest rate at the time of issuance. Moreover, green bonds issued by publicly listed corporations in China trade at a considerable discount to conventional bonds ( −33 bps) (Wang et al 2020), and contrast with the slightly positive greenium (0.16 bps) from the non-financial corporate sector over all EM countries (Fatica et al 2019). Agliardi and Agliardi (2019) use an SEM in their analysis of the secondary bond market, and argue that the size of the greenium is positively affected by: (1) more volatile asset prices, (2) more effective green technology that the bond finances, and (3) higher sustainability advantages, mitigating adverse effects on asset values caused by environmental damage.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flammer (2013Flammer ( , 2019 finds that the issuance of green bonds yields a positive announcement returns and improvements in long-term value operating and environmental performance in addition to an increase in green innovations and ownership by long-term and green investors. Other authors (Wang et al, 2020;Zhou and Cui, 2019) explore the impact of green bond issuance not only on companies' stock prices, but also on financial performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR). The empirical results indicate positive effects also on innovation capacity and companies' CSR.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of policy implications, our results suggest that green bond financing results in financial incentives for sponsors that contribute to align the objectives of companies that develop energy projects with those established at a national and supranational level that are environmentally friendly. The positive effect of the issuance of green bonds for sponsors adds to the positive influence for shareholders found by previous studies [32,33,43,44]. However, future research should extend the scope of the analysis to other sectors and other geographical areas in order to determine the prevalence of these results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In this vein, [32] states that green bonds have negligible diversification benefits for investors in corporate and treasury markets, and considerable diversification benefits for investors in stock and energy markets. Additionally, [33] find positive announcement stock returns for green bond new issues. This is consistent with the stakeholder value maximization theory that corporate commitment to sustainable financing increases firm value in the long term and, therefore, is favored by shareholders.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 92%