2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The market for sustainable seafood drives transformative change in fishery social-ecological systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of certified fisheries is growing [18] and many different types of certification schemes are now available [29]. Even though debate remains over the effectiveness of market-based mechanisms to enhance environmental management [66][67][68], there is some empirical evidence of environmental improvements and sustainability outcomes due to certification [28,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of certified fisheries is growing [18] and many different types of certification schemes are now available [29]. Even though debate remains over the effectiveness of market-based mechanisms to enhance environmental management [66][67][68], there is some empirical evidence of environmental improvements and sustainability outcomes due to certification [28,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition with ecolabeled products and the desire for other benefits of the certification eventually incentivise fisheries that are less sustainable to invest time and resources in the transformative change that is required to drive improvements, including partnerships and interactions with other players (e.g. supply chain actors, managers, environmental NGOs) [61]. Even though the pathways to change were mapped in an 'outcomes framework,' a survey to test of whether the assumed pathways and result chains actually occur as posited by the MSC had not been previously developed.…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these fisheries have realized a price premium from certification-the Western Australia rock lobster fishery primarily reaches the Asian market which traditionally does not place a premium on sustainability, and the Mexican and Bahamian spiny lobster fisheries have not had their chain of custody certified or had MSC logos placed on their products due the additional cost associated with its use (Bellchambers et al, 2016;Pérez-Ramírez et al, 2016). However, certification of Bahamian spiny lobster ensured continued access to the United States market (Travaille et al, 2019) and certification of the Western Australia rock lobster did help the fishery access European markets and reduced European Union tariffs on Australian seafood (Phillips et al, 2003;Marine Stewardship Council, 2009). There have been several nonmonetary benefits to each of these reef fisheries from certification, however, including improved scientific understanding and management of the fisheries, identification of specific actions for improved sustainability, greater coordination and participation of stakeholders in the fisheries management process, and increased governmental support to communities.…”
Section: Certification Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diverse set of market-based strategies also continues to evolve, as practitioners, researchers, and advocates continue to meld, shape, and innovate in the field. Last, a growing literature has begun to evaluate the impacts of these initiatives (CEA, 2014(CEA, , 2020aCarlson and Palmer, 2016;Cannon et al, 2018;Travaille et al, 2019;Arton et al, 2020), but it is still a relatively underdeveloped space in terms of science and evidence, which provides ample opportunity for researchers seeking to evaluate these practices and their level of impact on nature and people.…”
Section: Moving Market-based Interventions Into Reef Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certification can play a role in enabling collective problem solving by providing a set of goals and criteria (Healey, 1998) which can stimulate a shared ambition for joint-problem solving. Certification can also provide a timeline for improvement, enabling actors within these collaborative arrangements to resolve key environmental issues (Thomas Travaille et al, 2019). Certification may also serve as a boundary object, providing a (at least perceived) neutral technical set of standards that can depoliticise issues that perpetuate ongoing conflicts between key actors (such as industry and NGOs), such as land tenure, the source of disease or responsibility for deforestation (Eden, 2009).…”
Section: Certification and Aquaculture Governancementioning
confidence: 99%