The U.S. Navy 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429315565-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maritime Role in the North Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that the Soviet Union would sortie hundreds of submarines and surface warships to disrupt the Alliance's maritime link. How well the respective strategies of NATO and the Soviet Union would have fared remains a welleducated guess, but few estimates were particularly rosy with regard to the fortunes of merchantmen on the North Atlantic in a potential war with the Soviet Union [4]. Nonetheless, in 1986 Mearsheimer argued, "the Navy's main value for deterrence lies in the realm of sea control, where protection of NATO's sea lines of communication (SLOCs) might matter to Soviet decision-makers contemplating war in Europe" [5] While no major war between East and West came to pass between 1945 and 1989, regional conflicts did have an impact on international maritime commerce.…”
Section: Seaborne Commerce and Sea Control: Lessons From The Last Cen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the Soviet Union would sortie hundreds of submarines and surface warships to disrupt the Alliance's maritime link. How well the respective strategies of NATO and the Soviet Union would have fared remains a welleducated guess, but few estimates were particularly rosy with regard to the fortunes of merchantmen on the North Atlantic in a potential war with the Soviet Union [4]. Nonetheless, in 1986 Mearsheimer argued, "the Navy's main value for deterrence lies in the realm of sea control, where protection of NATO's sea lines of communication (SLOCs) might matter to Soviet decision-makers contemplating war in Europe" [5] While no major war between East and West came to pass between 1945 and 1989, regional conflicts did have an impact on international maritime commerce.…”
Section: Seaborne Commerce and Sea Control: Lessons From The Last Cen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the Soviet Union would sortie hundreds of submarines and surface warships to disrupt the Alliance's maritime link. How well the respective strategies of NATO and the Soviet Union would have fared remains a welleducated guess, but few estimates were particularly rosy with regard to the fortunes of merchantmen on the North Atlantic in a potential war with the Soviet Union [4]. Nonetheless, in 1986 Mearsheimer argued, "the Navy's main value for deterrence lies in the realm of sea control, where protection of NATO's sea lines of communication (SLOCs) might matter to Soviet decision-makers contemplating war in Europe" [5] While no major war between East and West came to pass between 1945 and 1989, regional conflicts did have an impact on international maritime commerce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%